----- Original Message ----- > On 04/08/2013 11:09 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > From a build point of view I think the patch looks ok. I can't comment on > > if it's safe to remove > > the fontconfig files though. I've created a bug: > > > > 8011693: Remove redundant fontconfig files > > > > Thank you very much. I will continue review on 2d-dev. >
You have a review from me and a bug ID, so should be good to go. The AWT developers have expressed before that they don't expect fontconfig files to be used even in 7 and have had ample opportunity to object. > J. > > > > > On 2013-04-08 10:00, Jiri Vanek wrote: > >> On 04/03/2013 04:42 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>> [Forwarding to 2d-dev] > >>> > >>> ----- Forwarded Message ----- > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> FontConfig files are no longer necessary for jdk7 and 8. I have patch > >>>> for > >>>> their removal > >>>> (http://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/oracle/jdk8/webrevs/removedFontConfigFiles/) > >>>> and I have built and > >>>> tested - looks ok. > >>>> This approach was recommended at - > >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-May/002547.html. > >>>> > >>>> To move forward with this issue I would like to have bug id if > >>>> possible. > >>>> Later I would like to > >>>> backport this also to JDK7.\ > >>>> > >>>> With kind regards > >>>> Jiri Vanek > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> This looks ok to me. I assume it builds? > >> > >> sure :) > >> > >>> > >>> There seems to generally be a lot of dead code in the jdk repository, > >>> which is > >>> very confusing for fixing anything. Glad to see some of it going. > >>> > >>> Let's get it into 8 first, then we can backport to 7. Oracle, can we > >>> have a bug ID please? > >>> > >> Trying my luck with build-...@openjdk.java.net.... > >> > >> J. > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
