I'm quite curious why OpenJDK can not have its fall-back font.
Will "Oracle" JDK lost its headless advantage?

Throw out an NoFontsFound exception, log it later, and fall to default (even dummy) font. Still better then die on nothing saying NPE



On 06/07/2013 09:19 PM, Phil Race wrote:
"Oracle" JDK ships with fonts. And it has a default fontconfig.properties (not
the same thing as libfontconfig) file that maps all the logical fonts to those 
fonts.
So it fully meets the spec and can function just fine on a system that has no 
other fonts installed.
So on reflection we wouldn't want to fail at this point without checking to see 
if we actually
can continue.
This doesn't help "Open" JDK as it is, since it doesn't have fonts, but there's 
nothing to stop
an OpenJDK port doing the exact same, except that its kind of pointless for a 
distro to do
that as it would be easier to make libfontconfig and some core fonts a 
pre-requisite package.

I think I'll need to review everyone's "requirements" again to say
exactly what should be the path forward.


This will be more then appreciated:) But I'm definitely not envying this 
responsibility to you.

Best regards, and thank you for this effort
J.


For your "headless" situation,  I'm not completely clear about what you intend 
to run,
but it occurs to me that if you are even tickling this code, its reasonable to 
suppose
that the app is likely to need fonts. Whereas someone running a back-end server 
app
would never initialise the AWT toolkit, so shouldn't care less whether fonts 
are installed.

-phil.


On 6/5/2013 9:38 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
I don't have enough of an understanding of the issues to say that this 
configuration should
necessarily be supported.  However, I am relatively sure that it shouldn't be 
supported just
enough to make the error and the code confusing.  If it doesn't find any fonts, 
FontConfigManager
logs something to the platform logger and returns quietly.

      213         if (anyFont == null) {
      214             if (FontUtilities.isLogging()) {
      215                 PlatformLogger logger = FontUtilities.getLogger();
      216 logger.info <http://logger.info>("Fontconfig returned no fonts at 
all.");
      217             }
      218             fontConfigFailed = true;
      219             return;

and then when the X11FontManager "believes" it doesn't find a default font, it 
does a fallback:

      787         /* Absolute last ditch attempt in the face of fontconfig 
problems.
      788          * If we didn't match, pick the first, or just make something
      789          * up so we don't NPE.
      790          */
      791         if (info[0] == null) {
      792             if (fontConfigFonts.length > 0 &&
      793 fontConfigFonts[0].firstFont.fontFile != null) {
      794                 info[0] = fontConfigFonts[0].firstFont.familyName;
      795                 info[1] = fontConfigFonts[0].firstFont.fontFile;
      796             } else {
      797                 info[0] = "Dialog";
      798                 info[1] = "/dialog.ttf";
      799             }
      800         }

That would make the casual reader believe that "no fonts" is a supported 
configuration (or, at
least, a configuration that isn't supposed to NPE).  But the fallback doesn't 
get hit in this
case, because the X11FontManager believes that getFontConfigFonts can't return 
null.

It seems reasonable to throw an exception, if that's what you want to do, but 
it seems to me that
the exception should have a relatively clear message about what happened, and 
the fact that that
configuration is unsupported.  If you really want not to have code that deals 
with a lack of
fonts, it would make a certain amount of sense to take out the code that is 
there and tries to do
so.  As it is, the code and its behavior occupy a very confusing middle ground, 
where the
developer has to trace through the library to figure out what happened and why 
it happened.

(As for not linking with libfontconfig: we're trying to make a JDK that works 
regardless of
whether fontconfig is there.  It should be able to work in headless, stripped 
down mode, and for a
developer who wants to use eclipse.  I don't mind if devs need to catch 
exceptions on the headless
machines, but they like to know why they are catching them.)

Jeremy



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com 
<mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    Hi!


    This is known issue - Openjdk fails when no fonts are installed.

    You can fix this by your own fontmanager (feel free to inspire at
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862355#c5 where I'm
    creating an custom dummy fontmanager in case of failure)
    You can set up similar manager class by -Dsun.font.fontmanager
    property.

    Or you can support me and "force somebody" to review my patch
    where I have tried to smuggle inside Openjdk default fallback font[1]

    On the contrary, if [1] will go in, then it can mask deeper
    problems (as can be eg yours).



    [1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2013-January/002999.html


    Best regards
     J.



    On 06/05/2013 01:32 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:

        Hi Phil,

        Thanks for the response.  You've actually caught me out: this
        was a bug I found a while ago, and am
        only now just getting around to reporting.  I made this change
        locally (inside Google), and lost my
        repro instructions.  It was probably for a user issue, which
        means that I'm too chicken to back it
        out and see what happens.  This fix looked obvious enough that
        I thought I could get away with it,
        since it is clearly the case that X11FontManager expects a
        non-null fontConfigFonts regardless of
        the value of fontConfigFailed.

        IIRC, the cause was either that the fontconfig library wasn't
        installed or that the fontconfig file
        was obsolete / incorrect for the given system.  I almost
        certainly did not fix any ULEs (I would
        have a record of that).  We have some stripped down systems,
        and this may have been one of them.  It
        was a headless configuration.  I did preserve my stack trace:

        Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at
        sun.awt.X11FontManager.getDefaultPlatformFont(X11FontManager.java:779)
        at
        sun.font.SunFontManager$2.run(SunFontManager.java:428) at
        java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at
        sun.font.SunFontManager.<init>(SunFontManager.java:371) at
        sun.awt.X11FontManager.<init>(X11FontManager.java:32) at
        sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
        Method) at
        
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at

sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at
        java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:530) at
        java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at
        java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at
        sun.font.FontManagerFactory$1.run(FontManagerFactory.java:80) at
        java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at
        sun.font.FontManagerFactory.getInstance(FontManagerFactory.java:71)
        at
        
sun.java2d.SunGraphicsEnvironment.getFontManagerForSGE(SunGraphicsEnvironment.java:185)
        at
        
sun.java2d.SunGraphicsEnvironment.getAllFonts(SunGraphicsEnvironment.java:192)
        at
        
sun.java2d.HeadlessGraphicsEnvironment.getAllFonts(HeadlessGraphicsEnvironment.java:91)

        I'm sure that the line numbers are obsolete, but you get the
        general idea. I don't seem to have what
        was beneath that in the stack, but I imagine it was something
        that was relatively comfortable with
        getAllFonts returning nothing (as appropriate).

        Having said all that, it seems to me that if fontConfigFailed
        is not allowed to be true unless you
        have a system configuration problem, then that should be made
        clear at runtime, and that you should
        not get rather mysterious NPEs at later points in the code.
         You do have a fallback in
        getDefaultPlatformFont that says "make something up so that we
        don't get NPE", which made me think
        that the original author intended to prefer avoiding NPEs.

        Jeremy


        On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Race
        <philip.r...@oracle.com <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>
        <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>>>

        wrote:

            Jeremy,

            Why didn't it return any fonts ? Is this because the
        libfontconfig library isn't installed ?

            We've been runtime loading that lib but these days could
        potentially
            switch to linking against it at compile time, in which
        case you won't
            even get this far. So in other words this could be a
        system config issue.
            The most common thing I've seen is that 64 bit Linux
        doesn't have
            all the libs to run a 32 bit JRE. You probably found and
        fixed all of those
            because it was Unsatisfiedlinkerror or similar but the
        runtime linking
            is disguising that its really the same problem.

            If you really don't have any fonts installed, then that's also
            a missing package and we perhaps should have a better
        diagnostic,
            but there isn't really any point in continuing anyway
        without any fonts.
            Even headless applications may require fonts.

            -phil.


            On 6/4/2013 2:50 PM, Jeremy Manson wrote:

                Hi folks,

                I encountered a NullPointerException in the above
        method, when fontconfig doesn't return any
                fonts:


http://hg.openjdk.java.net/__jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/__7eae7c89dab4/src/solaris/__classes/sun/awt/__X11FontManager.java




<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/7eae7c89dab4/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11FontManager.java>


                Line 779.  The issue is that FontConfigManager sets
        fontConfigFonts to null when Fontconfig
                doesn't return any fonts:


http://hg.openjdk.java.net/__jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/__7eae7c89dab4/src/solaris/__classes/sun/font/__FontConfigManager.java




<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/7eae7c89dab4/src/solaris/classes/sun/font/FontConfigManager.java>


                Line 218.

                The solution I came up with is to initialize
        fontConfigFonts with a zero-element array in
                this case:

                diff --git
        a/src/solaris/classes/sun/__font/FontConfigManager.java
                b/src/solaris/classes/sun/__font/FontConfigManager.java
                ---
        a/src/solaris/classes/sun/__font/FontConfigManager.java
                +++
        b/src/solaris/classes/sun/__font/FontConfigManager.java
                @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@
        logger.info <http://logger.info> <http://logger.info>
        <http://logger.info>("__Fontconfig returned no fonts at all.");


                              }
                              fontConfigFailed = true;
                +            fontConfigFonts = new FcCompFont[0];
                              return;
                          } else if (fontConfigFailed) {
                              for (int i = 0; i< fontArr.length; i++) {

                Thanks for your attention!

                Jeremy







Reply via email to