The "j2" idea presumably comes from "Java 2" which was a marketing invention
for JDK 1.2 in 1998 and has since been purged from all our docs, file
names etc etc ..
so it would not be my choice. Consider it obsolete / deprecated ..
So libjavajpeg.so would be better.
Presumably libjavajpeg.so would also be just the 'stub' code that via JNI
interfaces to the exported interfaces of the system libjpeg ?
-phil.
On 4/30/2014 7:17 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
Hi,
After updating OpenJDK so that system versions of the giflib, libpng and
lcms2 libraries can be used by OpenJDK, I am looking at addressing
libjpeg next.
The trouble here is that there is an actual name clash between (the
openjdk) libjpeg.so and (the system) libjpeg.so.
Any suggestions on what to fix? Is renaming the openjdk version to
libj2jpeg.so (or some other variant like libjavajpeg.so) acceptable?
IcedTea 2.x uses libjavajpeg.so so I suggest it is kept the same.
Thanks,
Omair
--
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
