On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/10/2014 2:31 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > >> I have tried to cross all the t's left here. I took your suggestion and >> minimized the test greatly. I've taken ownership of the bug and it's now >> marked noreg-hard. >> >> I'm inclined to check in the test case as is, even though it's manual. >> But I leave that to you, the 2d maintainers. >> >> The only testing I've done is to run the one manual test. Hope that's OK. >> >> OK to commit this fix? >> > > Do we yet have a 2nd reviewer on the change ? > Is that a client-libs-thing? In core-libs, one reviewer is enough for jdk9. This patch has been in use at Google for a while. > Other than that its fine by me. >
