Hi Phil, I changed subject of this email thread. webrev of this issue is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8017773/webrev.00/ I'm just an author of jdk9, not a committer. So could you be a sponsor of this issue? Yasumasa On 2014/09/20 4:19, Phil Race wrote: > Hi, > > It does seem like it may have been wrong to adjust the height of the > overall font metrics because of > a widened outline .. although there is likely to be less visible line > gap and more chance of clipping, > nonetheless I think this looks OK.. If we see such problems we can > re-consider. > > - Please get a "+1" from some one else too .. > - Please push it to 9-client, not 9-dev. ie > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk > > .. and thanks for the off-list ping on this. > > -phil. > > On 4/28/2014 7:00 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >> Hi Phili, >> >> I've created patch for this issue and uploaded webrev: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8017773/webrev.00/ >> >> >> Could you help me? >> >> Yasumasa >> >> >> On 04/10/2014 09:29 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >>> Hi Phili, >>> Thank you for replying. >>> >>>> I don't know the details of what is on the end of the various links you >>>> provide and >>>> I can't go grabbing code from somewhere else. >>> You can get patches as following: >>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=873&action=diff >>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1014&action=diff >>> >>> >>>> So step #1 would be for you to provide a patch I can consider under >>>> terms of the >>>> OCA against hg.openjdk.java/net/jdk9/client/jdk .. >>> I've agreed the OCA, and I'm an author of jdk9 project. >>> http://openjdk.java.net/census#ysuenaga >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Yasumasa >>> >>> >>> On 04/10/2014 05:12 AM, Phil Race wrote: >>>> All bugs should be fixed first in the main development release and back >>>> ported if appropriate. >>>> And in any case any targeting you see is purely what the manager-types >>>> are doing >>>> because of current rules that say a bug needs to be targeted to a release. >>>> It doesn't actually mean a thing here as I currently have no time to >>>> even consider this bug. >>>> I agree with the general premise that bold fonts should only be wider, >>>> not taller but >>>> I don't know the details of what is on the end of the various links you >>>> provide and >>>> I can't go grabbing code from somewhere else. >>>> >>>> So step #1 would be for you to provide a patch I can consider under >>>> terms of the >>>> OCA against hg.openjdk.java/net/jdk9/client/jdk .. >>>> >>>> -phil. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/3/2014 7:13 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Have you checked this issue? >>>>> >>>>> This issue will be fixed in JDK9. >>>>> However, I want fix it in JDK7 and JDK8. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yasumasa >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2014/03/17 9:02, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> The "Fix version" of this issue has been changed into 9 from 8-pool. >>>>>> Will this issue not be fixed in JDK7/8 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think this issue is bug of OpenJDK implementation. >>>>>> So this issue should be fixed ASAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yasumasa >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2014/02/13 16:38, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've reported about JDK-8017773 . Have you checked it ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess that many Linux distributor will ship OpenJDK8 after JDK8 GA is >>>>>>> released. >>>>>>> If this issue will not fix at JDK8 GA, many users who use 2D on JDK8 >>>>>>> may encounter it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This issue occurs in OpenJDK only. >>>>>>> However, I think there are many users who want to use 2D on OpenJDK. >>>>>>> So I hope to fix this issue ASAP and hope to backport to JDK7. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please cooperate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yasumasa >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2014/02/03 15:12, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My customer encountered this issue. >>>>>>>> I think this issue is caused by Bug 1435 [1] and 1659 [2] in IcedTea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I read source code of "freetype-2.5.0-4.fc20" . >>>>>>>> Bold style should affect Font Glyph only. However, current >>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>> of OpenJDK affects Font Face. Thus value of Ascent/Descent is >>>>>>>> incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OracleJDK seems to use sun.font.T2KFontScaler to calculate these >>>>>>>> values. >>>>>>>> So this issue occurs in OpenJDK only. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we need to merge patches of Bug 1435 and 1659 in IcedTea >>>>>>>> to fix JDK-8017773 . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you merge these patches ? >>>>>>>> Please cooperate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yasumasa >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1435 >>>>>>>> [2] http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1659 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------ D E T A I L S ------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've created testcase as "JavaApplication1.java" . >>>>>>>> Result as: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OracleJDK 6 Update 31 >>>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>>> [root@RHEL6-5 font]# /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_31/bin/java JavaApplication1 >>>>>>>> JDK: 1.6.0_31 >>>>>>>> VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.awt.Font[family=IPAMincho,name=IPAMincho,style=plain,size=50] >>>>>>>> Ascent: 43.99414 >>>>>>>> Descent: 6.0058594 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.awt.Font[family=IPAMincho,name=IPAMincho,style=bold,size=50] >>>>>>>> Ascent: 43.99414 >>>>>>>> Descent: 6.0058594 >>>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OpenJDK7 (in RHEL6.5) >>>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>>> [root@RHEL6-5 font]# java JavaApplication1 >>>>>>>> JDK: 1.7.0_45 >>>>>>>> VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.awt.Font[family=IPAMincho,name=IPAMincho,style=plain,size=50] >>>>>>>> Ascent: 43.99414 >>>>>>>> Descent: 6.0058594 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.awt.Font[family=IPAMincho,name=IPAMincho,style=bold,size=50] >>>>>>>> Ascent: 45.60547 >>>>>>>> Descent: 4.3945312 >>>>>>>> ---------------- >
