Hello Phil,
the change looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
On 4/30/2015 12:47 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Please review the 8u backport of the same
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8078331.8u/
I will ease this by noting the following
- I generated the webrev by applying the 9 patch to 8u.
- The changes differ from the JDK 9 patch only in the respect that
JDk 9 had this one change (by us) that was not backported.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/ae261c9704a6
- Otherwise the patch is identical and I verified this by 'diffing'
the 2 patches.
- Furthermore I 'diffed' the resulting 8 files against the 9 files and
they are all identical
So the end result is that we will have exactly LCMS 2.7 "FCS/GA" in
both JDK 8u60 and JDK 9
I am also running a full JPRT job to make sure there are no build
surprises.
-phil.
On 04/28/2015 09:39 PM, Andrew Brygin wrote:
Hello Phil,
the change looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Andrew.
29/04/15 00:34, Phil Race wrote:
On 04/21/2015 03:47 PM, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078331
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8078331/
These changes are all directly from upstream LCMS.
It takes us from 2.6 plus a couple of patches to the 2.7 release
with the
upstream version of those patches. Modulo 'white space' we will be
100% in sync with the LCMS current release, for perhaps the first
time.
I'm running a full JPRT job to validate my local builds.
-phil.
