Hi, * Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> [2016-01-21 17:55]: > On 01/21/2016 01:50 PM, Omair Majid wrote: > >That said, do you think some sort of add-and-check-for-overflow test > >would be suitable here? I can take a shot at implementing it, if you > >like. > > Sure ! (to the code change option).
The following webrev implements that: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/le-signed-overflow-warnings/00/ It uses comparisons with INT32_MAX and INT32_MIN instead of performing an addition or subtraction on the variable itself to avoid an overflow. With this, I no longer get any overflow warnings. On the other hand, if you think these checks are redundant, then I would be happy to remove these too. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681