Looks ok to me.

-phil.

On 02/09/2016 03:46 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
Let me know if/when you have an updated webrev. It should be good to go, but it couldn't hurt to publish one for the archives...

            ...jim

On 2/9/16 12:51 AM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
Jim,

Here are my answers to your 2 questions:

2016-02-09 0:14 GMT+01:00 Jim Graham <james.gra...@oracle.com
<mailto:james.gra...@oracle.com>>:

    In the test case, why are you using a log handler to check for a
    particular exception?  Shouldn't any exception logged be cause for a
    test failure?


I already used that code in 1 other test: TextClipErrorTest. I agree it
can be simpler to report any exception like:
             public void publish(LogRecord record) {
                 Throwable th = record.getThrown();
                 // detect any Throwable:
                 if (th != null) {
                     System.out.println("Test failed:\n" +
record.getMessage());
                     th.printStackTrace(System.out);

                     throw new RuntimeException("Test failed: ", th);
                 }
             }

    Is there a reason why you reversed the calculations for the slope at
    line 374?

+ final double slope = (x1d - x2) / (y1d - y2);

I prefer this syntax as it is more explicit that (x1d - x2) and (y1d -
y2) are double values (not implicit promotion).

Cheers,
Laurent

Reply via email to