Jim, Yes these results were obtained with MapBench and a specific profile:
Loading profile file: /home/marlin/mapbench/bin/../profiles/shared_nu-tx.properties Profile properties (merged with defaults): doRotate=true doScale=true rotateAngle=3.123456789 (deg) scaleX=1.156 scaleY=0.945 Moreover, I checked in the code (system.out.println) that this benchmark really tests the modified pipeline (non-uniform case). Cheers, Laurent 2016-03-15 0:35 GMT+01:00 Jim Graham <[email protected]>: > Was this on a uniform scale? Did you do a test with a non-uniform scale? > > ...jim > > On 3/11/2016 3:10 PM, Laurent Bourgès wrote: > >> Jim, >> >> Here are MapBench results comparing Marlin 0.7.3.2 (before) vs patched >> 0.7.3.3 (latest patch) on JDK 1.8_72: >> >> Synthetic results: >> >> Tests 36 12 12 12 >> Threads 4 1 2 4 >> >> Before = Marlin 0.7.3.2 <http://0.7.3.2>: >> *Med 168.535 165.403 166.940 173.263 * >> *Pct95 170.256 166.011 167.495 177.260 >> FPS 43.200 43.404 43.203 42.993 * >> >> Patched = Marlin 0.7.3.3 <http://0.7.3.3>: >> *Med 169.481 166.344 168.096 174.004 * >> *Pct95 170.295 166.800 168.751 175.335 >> FPS 42.194 42.340 42.211 42.031 >> >> * >> The difference is very minor ~ 1/2ms in global average (36 or 12 tests) >> ie within error margin ! >> Only FPS (based on median timings) seem indicating that Marlin 0.7.3.2 >> is 'very slightly' faster.* >> * >> * >> >
