Whoops, I didn't see this before...

Casts should be followed by a space as in:

(Foo) bar  // correct
(Foo)bar   // incorrect

                        ...jim

On 3/23/16 5:41 AM, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Thanks Jim and Phil.
Yes. It was a mistake to omit spaces in 'if' conditions. I have corrected the 
spacing issues for my changes now.

I have corrected the indentation of the lines similar to those mentioned by 
Phil.
I have also removed the redundant first condition check on line 890 in 
Raster.java mentioned as a review comment.

Please review updated webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/ajit/6353518/webrev.03/

Regards,
Ajit

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Race
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 4:40 AM
To: Jim Graham
Cc: Ajit Ghaisas; Sergey Bylokhov; 2d-dev
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] Review-request for 6353518: Creation of a 
WritableRaster with a custom DataBuffer causes erroneous Exception

Ajit,

There is also some odd indentation in ByteBandedRaster.java which is not yours 
but

   98     public ByteBandedRaster(SampleModel sampleModel,
    99                                DataBufferByte dataBuffer,
   100                                Point origin) {


This appears to be the result of someone using tabs a long time ago.

Since you are touching the method signature lines anyway may be better fixed so 
we have these aligned

       public ByteBandedRaster(SampleModel sampleModel,
                               DataBufferByte dataBuffer,
                               Point origin) {

[not sure if that will make it through mail as intended].

Here in Raster.java, the first condition now seems to be redundant ..
890         if (dataType == DataBuffer.TYPE_BYTE &&
   891             dataBuffer instanceof DataBufferByte &&



-phil.


On 03/22/2016 03:28 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
Hi Ajit,

Most of your if statements are spaced wrong.  There should be a space
between "if" and the parentheses.  I'll review more later, but I
noticed that issue in the first couple of files I looked at...

         ...jim

On 3/15/16 7:05 AM, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi,

     Thanks Sergey and Jim for suggestions.

      I have made the data specific Raster constructors type safe now.
Also, I have modified all Raster creations in Raster.java to support
custom DataBuffer classes.

      Please review the changes present in updated webrev :
      http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/ajit/6353518/webrev.02/

Regards,
Ajit

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Graham
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:40 AM
To: Sergey Bylokhov; Ajit Ghaisas; 2d-dev
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] Review-request for 6353518:
Creation of a WritableRaster with a custom DataBuffer causes
erroneous Exception

Yes, those constructors should be type-safe.  Perhaps that was done
to save code in the caller, but that is a small price to pay to avoid
errors in the future, and it makes sure there is a backup plan for
different kinds of buffers...

             ...jim

On 3/10/16 4:48 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Ajit.
What about other cases in Raster.java, where the DataBuffer is
passed as a parameter? Probably we can simplify the code and find
all such issues if we changes the ByteInterleavedRaster/etc. For example:

ByteInterleavedRaster(SampleModel sampleModel,DataBuffer
dataBuffer,...) to

ByteInterleavedRaster(SampleModel sampleModel,DataBufferByte
dataBuffer,...)

Because we throw an exception in such cases anyway:

if (!(dataBuffer instanceof DataBufferByte)) {
       throw new RasterFormatException("ByteInterleavedRasters must
have "
+ "byte DataBuffers");
}

And the compiler will help us, what everybody think about it?

On 09.03.16 17:38, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi,

      Modified the test and added check for
MultiPixelPackedSampleModel condition.

      Please review updated webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/ajit/6353518/webrev.01/

Regards,
Ajit

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Bylokhov
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:06 PM
To: Ajit Ghaisas; awt-...@openjdk.java.net; Semyon Sadetsky;
Ambarish Rapte; 2d-dev
Subject: Re: [9] Review-request for 6353518: Creation of a
WritableRaster with a custom DataBuffer causes erroneous Exception

Changes for 2d area.(cc)


On 07.03.16 11:20, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi,

Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6353518

Issue : (Text from bug description)

An attempt to create a WritableRaster via
Raster.createWritableRaster(SampleModel sm, DataBuffer db, Point
location) using a custom DataBuffer causes an erroneous
RasterFormatException.
Apparently the reason for this bug is that IntegerComponentRaster
insists on being passed an instance of DataBufferInt rather than
just a DataBuffer with a DataType of TYPE_INT.
This is quite annoying since DataBufferInt is declared final and
thus cannot be extended.

Fix :

The last line of Raster.createWritableRaster() method already has
a way to handle generic case if the input does not match any of
the cases in switch statements in that method.

The fact that  " *InterleavedRaster() constructors throw exception
if DataBuffer passed to them does not match the expected type" was
ignored earlier.

This fix adds a check of "DataBuffer type" before creating
respective
*InterleavedRaster() objects.

It constructs the SunWritableRaster in case DataBuffer type does
not match any data specific DataBuffer classes (DataBufferByte,
DataBufferUShort, DataBufferInt)

Request to review webrev containing this fix :

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/ajit/6353518/webrev.00/

Regards,

Ajit



--
Best regards, Sergey.




Reply via email to