On 04/25/2016 08:34 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Some tweaks are possible also:
- In some cases like in PrintServiceLookupProvider.java it is possible to use Integer.parseInt() instead of "Integer.valueOf()" + "intValue()".

That [one] seems easy enough but I don't see any more in the webrev.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8154213.1

 - also fixes the typo in JLayeredPane.java


- It is also possible to use classes like Integer = GetIntegerAction() instead of "String = GetPropertyAction()".

I don't see this used anywhere in the patch and so it seems like that should
be dealt with as a separate issue.

-phil.

On 25.04.16 8:11, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Phil,

My 2 cents:
JLayeredPane.java has typo Integer.valueOf.valueOf.
In some cases, you have used

Float.valueOf(xx) like in ServiceDialog.java, PNGImageDecoder.java

but in some cases you jave used

lmObj = lmVal; without using Float.valueOf(). Shouldn't we be consistent
to use auto-boxing? Regards Prasanta

On 4/22/2016 11:36 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154213
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8154213/

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145468 has caused
the following constructors usages to be deprecated :
new Long(long) and new Integer(String)
new Integer(int) and new Integer(String)
new Float(int) and new Float(String)
new Double(int) and new Double(String)
new Character(char)

The deprecations warnings were suppressed for the java.desktop module.

This fix changes all uses in the java.desktop module to use
Foo.valueOf(..)
or in a few cases where we directly assign to a variable use auto-boxing.

Additionally doc comments that use constructors were updated.

Finally the deprecation suppression was removed.

JPRT has been used to verify the build and I have run through the
various affected Swing L&Fs using SwingSet as a sanity check.

I do not have any information on the performance difference (benefits
or otherwise)
of this change but I did not see any usage in java.desktop that
appears to be
remotely performance critical.

-phil.





Reply via email to