1) The spec for the constructors needs to be updated to include this reason for throwing ImagingOpException. A CCC request will be needed.
2) The C usage of "isnan()" may be problematic in some compilation environments. For example I believe this will not compile with VS2010, and many folks still use that. Instead you could use matrix[j] != matrix[j] as the two values should not compare
equal if it is NaN. -phil. On 08/10/2016 04:15 AM, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi, Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158356 Issue : AffineTransform using NaN value as input parameter results in SIGSEGV. Fix : Transformation matrix is checked for NaN values in AffineTransformOp.validateTransform(). Also, at native level a separate check is made to return error in case of NaN values. Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aghaisas/8158356/webrev.00/ Request you to review. Regards, Ajit