1) The spec for the constructors needs to be updated to include this
reason for throwing ImagingOpException. A CCC request will be needed.
2) The C usage of "isnan()" may be problematic in some compilation
environments.
For example I believe this will not compile with VS2010, and many folks
still use that.
Instead you could use matrix[j] != matrix[j] as the two values should
not compare
equal if it is NaN.
-phil.
On 08/10/2016 04:15 AM, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi,
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158356
Issue : AffineTransform using NaN value as input parameter results in
SIGSEGV.
Fix : Transformation matrix is checked for NaN values in
AffineTransformOp.validateTransform().
Also, at native level a separate check is made to return error in
case of NaN values.
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aghaisas/8158356/webrev.00/
Request you to review.
Regards,
Ajit
