I did not notice that. It is indeed bizarre. I was trying to take some calculations outside the loops to obtain a small performance improvement and did not notice the name transposition. I’ll update it.
Thanks, Brian On Sep 1, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > 168 int gain = step * srcWidth; > 169 int bound = srcWidth * step; > > This looks odd. Is it what you meant ?
