I was expecting that; will update. Thanks,
Brian On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > Looks OK except for the same question about using 0xFFFFFFFF. > > -phil. > > On 12/6/16, 12:31 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Continuing from thread [1]. >> >> Pursuant to comments from the CCC, the patch [2] has been updated. The >> changes with respect to the previous version of the patch [3] are to clarify >> the specification of TIFFField(TIFFTag,long) in terms of the constructor’s >> description and the exceptions it throws, and to add an exception for the >> case of value>= 4294967296, i.e., above the range of a 32-bit unsigned int. >> >> Once this patch is approved the CCC request may be updated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian >> >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-November/007963.html >> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169725/webrev.01/ >> [3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169725/webrev.00/ >> >> On Nov 23, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Philip Race<philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> -phil
