Here is an updated patch http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8154058/webrev.02/
which differs from the previous one only in terms of the test which has been updated to verify that: 1) essential metadata are not affected by the settings of ignoreMetadata and readUnknownTags; 2) non-essential metadata with a recognized tag are suppressed by ignoreMetadata == true, but when ignoreMetadata == false are unaffected by the setting of readUnknownTags; 3) metadata with an unrecognized tag are read if and only if ignoreMetadata == false and readUnknownTags == true. Thanks, Brian On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that spec. looks good so you can at least proceed with the CCC. > > -phil. > > On 12/07/2016 01:07 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Reprising thread [1]. >> >> Issue: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-August/007449.html >> Patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8154058/webrev.01/ >> Doc: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8154058/tiff_metadata.html#MetadataIssuesRead >> >> Note that this is a preliminary version as an improved test will be needed. >> A CCC review will be in order however so it would be best to get far enough >> to submit a request. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian >> >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-August/007449.html >
