+1
-phil.
On 3/29/17, 6:16 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-03-29 15:00, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The build of freetype used internally at Oracle when building OpenJDK
builds (for the reference implementation) is very old. It was also
built using Visual Studio 2010, which makes it require msvcr100.dll,
while the rest of OpenJDK is built with Visual Studio 2013 and
subsequently require msvcr120.dll.
I have built new freetype binaries, using Visual Studio 2013, from
the latest available freetype source, 2.7.1. We have verified that
the OpenJDK builds using these binaries are behaving equally to those
with the old binary, except for not requiring msvcr100.dll. This
patch changes the jib-profiles configuration for JDK 9 to use the new
freetype binaries.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177135
Patch:
diff -r c38c6b270ccc common/conf/jib-profiles.js
--- a/common/conf/jib-profiles.js
+++ b/common/conf/jib-profiles.js
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@
freetype: {
organization: common.organization,
ext: "tar.gz",
- revision: "2.3.4+1.0",
+ revision: "2.7.1-v120+1.0",
module: "freetype-" + input.target_platform
}
};
/Erik
Looks good to me.
/Magnus
