Phil, Do you approve the patch and the javadoc too ?
If yes, could you push it for me into OpenJDK10 ? Laurent 2017-04-20 11:55 GMT+02:00 Prahalad Kumar Narayanan < [email protected]>: > Looks good to me. > > Thanks > Have a good day > > Prahalad N. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Laurent Bourgès [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:51 AM > To: Prahalad Kumar Narayanan > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] RFR 8078192: Path2D storage trimming > > Hello, > Here is an updated webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lbourges/path2D/Path2D-8078192.1/ > I fixed the copyright dates and the javadoc as you proposed (I initially > derived the javadoc from Vector.trimToSize) > Thanks, > Laurent > > 2017-04-20 5:46 GMT+02:00 Prahalad Kumar Narayanan < > [email protected]>: > Hello Laurent > > The code changes look good. > . The new method trimToSize effectively does the same operation > (Arrays.copyOf) as done by the copy contructors. > . The test file- Path2DCopyConstructor now tests after executing the > methods pathObj.trimToSize and pathObj.clone > > With regard to the text in Javadoc comments > . I felt, the first line clearly explains the operation - > "Trims the capacity of this Path2D instance to its current > size." > . The immediate following line is redundant and may not be required - > "If the capacity .. is larger than its current size... " > . The third line will be required till the end of the comments - > "An application can use ... minimize the storage of a path. > ... since 10" > . This is my observation. You could wait for other suggestions. > > Btw, the copyright year should be changed to 2017 in both Path2D.java and > the test file. > (Some use automation scripts that modify the year at the time of check-in. > If so, kindly ignore the observation) > > Thanks > Have a good day > > Prahalad N. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:49:33 +0200 > From: Laurent Bourg?s <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Phil Race > <[email protected]>, Jim Graham <[email protected]>, > Iris > Clark <[email protected]> > Subject: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] RFR 8078192: Path2D storage trimming > Message-ID: > <CAKjRUT7zQ=ZSqiQdbpdtOeCOSFoLVPzqHdvi-pXzsmwTgKRbDw@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi, > > Here is a first attempt to propose a Path2D patch (based on JDK10): > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lbourges/path2D/Path2D-8078192.0/ > > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078192 > > Please review the Path2D changes, notably the javadoc (english) and the > modified Path2DCopyConstructor test which checks all public Path2D methods > on concrete classes (Path2D.Float, Path2D.Double, GeneralPath) after > calling path.trimToSize() > > Cheers, > Laurent > > > > -- > -- > Laurent Bourgès > -- -- Laurent Bourgès
