*/>[Shashi] Yes. I intend to use the default paper object as this is a test related to the cross platform default printer dialog. > In the modified test file, I have set the size of the physical paper instead of relying it on the default setting which may > vary as you pointed out, depending on the locale./*

*/>Now that we have our own paper object(with a constant paper size) and based on the margin setting(which are const/**/> it won’t cause an undesirable behavior like going into negative space./*
Sorry, that is not a valid thing to do. The print dialog is free to ignore this
or workaround the incompatibility of that paper with the supported media so 
your test is not reliable.
And I don't see what the cross platform print dialog has to do with it.
It is, or should be, just as aware of the printer sizes as the native one.

-phil.



On 06/12/2017 03:34 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

Hi Phil, Please see below for the comments:

The updated Webrev is at:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aghaisas/shashi/6949753/webrev_05/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eaghaisas/shashi/6949753/webrev_05/>


Modified in what way from the previous version ?

-phil.

Thanks and regards,
Shashi

*From:*Phil Race
*Sent:* Saturday, June 10, 2017 3:07 AM
*To:* Prasanta Sadhukhan <prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>; Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
*Cc:* 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Subject:* Re: [9]JDK-6949753:[TEST BUG]: java/awt/print/PageFormat/PDialogTest.java needs update by removing a infinite loop

private static void setValuesForPrintPageSetup(PageFormat pageFormat,  int
118             marginValue) throws PrinterException {
119         Paper paper = new Paper();
double paperHeight = paper.getHeight();
122         double paperWidth = paper.getWidth();
123         double paperX = paper.getImageableX();
124         double paperY = paper.getImageableY();
125 paper.setImageableArea(paperX * marginValue, paperY * marginValue,
126                 paperWidth - (paperX * 2 * marginValue),
127                 paperHeight - (paperY * 2 * marginValue));
105         setValuesForPrintPageSetup(pageFormat, 3);
I see you call new Paper() above
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/awt/print/Paper.html#Paper--
Did you really intend to use a default paper instead of getting the one
from the pageFormat ? On some label printer your Letter Paper may not
even be supported. US (aka NA) Letter is 8.5" wide.
Also although it probably will work out OK the maths isn't checking
for boundary problems.
default margin will be 1" so that's what you'll get for paperX and paperY
Using your value of 3 we set the imagable area such that
imageable X = 1 * 3 = 3
imageableWidth = 8.5 - (1 * 2 *3) = 8.5 - 6 = 2.5;
Fortunately that worked out positive .. but it does not seem to be enforced.
If we'd used 5 it would be a different story :
ix = 5, iw = 8.5 - ( 1 * 2 * 5) = -1.5
The implementation will (should) clamp it to non-negative but it
might still be better to have some defensive logic of your own.
*/[Shashi] Yes. I intend to use the default paper object as this is a test related to the cross platform default printer dialog. In the modified test file, I have set the size of the physical paper instead of relying it on the default setting which may vary as you pointed out, depending on the locale./* */Now that we have our own paper object(with a constant paper size) and based on the margin setting(which are constants), it won’t cause an undesirable behavior like going into negative space./*
nit: there's a missing space here
75                 } catch(PrinterException e) {
*/[Shashi] This is fixed now./*
-phil.

On 06/09/2017 03:27 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:

    looks good to me.

    Regards
    Prasanta

    On 6/9/2017 3:49 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

        Hi All, Please find the updated Webrev with fixes for the
        comments @
        http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_04/
        <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_04/>

        Thanks and regards,
        Shashi

        *From:*Philip Race
        *Sent:* Thursday, June 8, 2017 3:32 AM
        *To:* Prasanta Sadhukhan <prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>
        <mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>
        *Cc:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
        <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
        <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>;
        2d-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
        *Subject:* Re: [9]JDK-6949753:[TEST BUG]:
        java/awt/print/PageFormat/PDialogTest.java needs update by
        removing a infinite loop

        .. and please make sure all lines are <= 80 chars as per the
        coding standards.

        -phil.

        On 6/6/17, 11:59 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:

            do_test() does not need to be under EDT as it invokes
            printer pagedialog and not swing components. Actually,
            createUI() needs to be under EDT which has not been done.

            Also,

            79         SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(() -> {

              80             test.disposeUI();

              81         });

              82     }

            should be called before you throw RuntimeException when
            test times out .

            There is no need of calling this after

            75         if (test.testResult == false) {

              76             throw new RuntimeException("Test Failed.");

              77         }

            as it has already been called in pass/fail actionlistener.

            Also, put a sleep after T1.start() and do_test() otherwise
            since they are in separate thread, in mycase, pagedialog
            is displayed before test instructions dialog.

            Regards

            Prasanta

            On 6/7/2017 11:50 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                Hi All,

                I have altered the manual test template per the comments.

                1.Have moved the test instructions window under newly
                created thread.

                2.Have moved the print dialog(main test module) under EDT.

                3.Timer management shall be done on the main thread.

                I have placed the updated Webrev @
                http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_03/
                
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_03/>

                Please let me know if any comments on it.

                Thanks and regards,

                Shashi

                *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
                *Sent:* Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:52 AM
                *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
                <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>;
                2d-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
                *Cc:* Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
                <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>
                *Subject:* Re: [9]JDK-6949753:[TEST BUG]:
                java/awt/print/PageFormat/PDialogTest.java needs
                update by removing a infinite loop

                As I told, pageDialog is modal so latch.await() will
                not be called if user does not close the page dialog
                or do any interaction. The actual test

                59         PageFormat pageFormat = new PageFormat();

                  60

                  61         createNewPrintPageSetup(pageFormat);

                 62

                  63         setValuesForPrintPageSetup(pageFormat, 2);

                  64

                  65         createNewPrintPageSetup(pageFormat);

                  66

                  67         setValuesForPrintPageSetup(pageFormat, 3);

                  68

                  69         createNewPrintPageSetup(pageFormat);


                should be done in other thread.

                Regards
                Prasanta

                On 6/6/2017 11:24 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                    The manual test template that I received from the
                    team seems buggy and an older version it seems. I
                    have modified the same per your inputs and now
                    placed the updated Webrev at
                    
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_02/
                    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_02/>.

                    Thanks and regards,

                    Shashi

                    *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
                    *Sent:* Monday, June 5, 2017 12:35 PM
                    *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                    <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
                    <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>;
                    2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
                    <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
                    *Cc:* Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
                    <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>
                    *Subject:* Re: [9]JDK-6949753:[TEST BUG]:
                    java/awt/print/PageFormat/PDialogTest.java needs
                    update by removing a infinite loop

                    I guess there is one more problem in usage of
                    CountDown latch. Have you seen this test fail with
                    timeout even if you wait for 5 minutes as per your
                    timeout period?

                    latch.await() needs to be wait on main thread
                    while the test needs to be executed in another
                    thread otherwise, pageDialog being modal the
                    control will not come to latch.await()

                    Iguess you need to do this.

                    TestUI test = new TestUI(latch);
                            Thread T1 = new Thread(test);
                            T1.start();

                    class TestUI implements Runnable {
                    ...
                    @Override
                        public void run() {
                            try {
                                createUI();

                    Regards
                    Prasanta

                    On 6/2/2017 4:00 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                        Hi, I have fixed the comments below and
                        updated the webrev @
                        
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_01/
                        
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_01/>

                        Thanks and regards,

                        Shashi

                        *From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
                        *Sent:* Friday, June 2, 2017 12:36 PM
                        *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
                        <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
                        <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>;
                        2d-dev@openjdk.java.net
                        <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
                        *Cc:* Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
                        <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>
                        *Subject:* Re: [9]JDK-6949753:[TEST BUG]:
                        java/awt/print/PageFormat/PDialogTest.java
                        needs update by removing a infinite loop

                        Test fix look ok. Only thing is, you can call
                        getPrinterJob() once and reutilise instead of
                        calling 3 times and probably there is no need
                        of creating a
                        functioncreateNewPrintPageSetup() for it (as
                        it calls 1 method) but it is upto you.

                        Few comments:

                        Copyright should have "," after 2017.
                        I guess createUI() does not have any call that
                        throws exception so no need to have try-catch
                        block for createUI().
                        Also, there is no need to catch
                        PrinterException and rethrow RuntimeException,
                        so you can do away with that try-catch.
                        Also, you can call disposeUI() in passButton
                        and failButton actionlistener instead of in
                        main(). Also, there is no need to do
                        setVisible(false) in disposeUI(), dispose()
                        will take care of that.
                        You can throw RuntimeException when test timed
                        out (instead of just println and later getting
                        test fail exception) which is different from
                        Test Failed RuntimeException.

                        Regards
                        Prasanta

                        On 6/1/2017 5:10 PM, Shashidhara
                        Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                            Hi All,

                            Please review a fix for a test bug which contained 
an infinite loop to test the printer setup dialog's margin attributes retention 
without the manual step procedure.

                            The issue with PDialogTest.java which tests the 
printer setup dialog's margin attributes retention by having as infinite loop 
to keep popping up the dialog without a proper exit. The test does not cover 
the instruction steps necessary to properly test dialog's margin attributes 
retention.

                            The updated test file includes the standard manual 
test template along with test cases to cover the printer dialog's margin 
attributes retention feature.

                            Bug:

                            <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6949753>
                            <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6949753>

                            Webrev:

                            
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_00/>
                            
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/shashi/6949753/webrev_00/>

                            Note : PrintDialog on Mac does not show page 
margins and hence this test does not run on Mac.

                            Thanks and regards,

                            Shashi


Reply via email to