looks good. One more thing, you could probably use

if (info4->Attributes & PRINTER_ATTRIBUTE_NETWORK) {

instead of hardcoding

if (info4->Attributes & 0x00000010) {


Also,

getAllPrinterNames() shares more than 80% code with your recently addedGetRemotePrintersNames(). Probably we could optimise getAllPrinterNames to use yours by having a parameter(all/remote) but it's upto you. Regards Prasanta

On 6/22/2018 12:53 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

Hi Prasanta, Thank you for the review. Here is the new Webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.05/>

For the EnumPrinters case, I think the cReturned is sufficient as it is set to zero every time we start.

Thanks and regards,

Shashi

*From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
*Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 10:41 AM
*To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>; Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>; 2d-dev <2d-dev@openjdk.java.net> *Subject:* Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

I guess

if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {
  70                 pollServices = true;
  71             } else if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false")) {
  72                 pollServices = false;
  73             }
can be written as
if (pollStr.equalsIgnoreCase("false"))
pollServices = false;
as it is already defaulted to true.

78          * for polling PrintServices.  The default is 120.

I guess default is 240.

also, EnumPrinters returns bool, which we should check like

263         if (cReturned > 0 && enumprintersret !=0 ) {
Regards
Prasanta

On 6/22/2018 10:03 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

    Hi Phil, Thanks for your review.

    I have made your suggested changes and here is the updated webrev:

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/
    <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.04/>

    Need one more review to commit this.

    Note: A network printer can be added via the ‘Add a printer’ under
    the ‘Devices and Printers’ dialog. A network printer will have the
    property ‘Device description’ set to ‘Network printer connection’.

    Thanks and regards,

    Shashi

    *From:*Phil Race
    *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 2:16 AM
    *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
    <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
    <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>; 2d-dev
    <2d-dev@openjdk.java.net> <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
    *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote
    printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

    I thought you were going to make the refresh time 4 minutes ?
    I don't see that it has to be the same on Windows as it was on Unix,
    if you say 4 minutes is a sensible value there .. and 4 mins will be
    less CPU wake up, so I'd back that (4 mins) ahead of 2 minutes as
    the default here.

    You still have missing white space

    432             while(true) {


    With these two changes you have my +1 ..

    BTW the native diff looks MUCH better now - thanks !

    -phil.

    On 06/21/2018 01:33 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

        Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev for changes you suggested.

        http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/
        <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.03/>

        Thanks and regards,

        Shashi

        *From:*Phil Race
        *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2018 1:02 AM
        *To:* Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
        <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
        <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>; 2d-dev
        <2d-dev@openjdk.java.net> <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
        *Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote
        printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

        +        private static final long DELAY = 1000 * 60 * 4; // 4
        min pooling

        I think we need a System Property that can control this.

        I suggest the name "sun.java2d.print.minRefreshTime" which is
        what we use on Unix.

        and similarly to there we should have
        "sun.java2d.print.polling" which is a boolean

        and controls whether we do this at all ..

        See
        src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/PrintServiceLookupProvider.java

        Lots of places where you are missing a space before "("

        +            if(str1.length != str2.length) {

        +                for(int i = 0;i < str1.length;i++) {

        +                    for(int j = 0;j < str2.length;j++) {

        +                        if(!str1[i].equals(str2[j])) {

        +            while(true) {

        +                if(doCompare(prevRemotePrinters,
        currentRemotePrinters)) {

        There's some of that in native too

        266                 if(info4->Attributes & 0x00000010) {

        In
        
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html
        
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp.sdiff.html>

        you seem to have moved all the existing and (I think)
        unchanged related functions so the DIFF appears

        much bigger than it really is. Please move them back and
        re-generate.

        The test really needs to provide an "out" for someone running
        the test who has no way

        to add a network printer .. they don't want to have to fail
        the test.

        As well as that, arguably this should be an @ignore test, so
        it is not run unless

        you are trying to run all the tests.

        -phil.

        On 06/21/2018 12:08 PM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

            Hi Phil, Here is the new Webrev. I chose 4 mins because I
            think it takes around 2 mins to add a new network printer,
            hence I felt 4 mins is a good time.

            The windows **PrinterChangeNotifications** calls are a
            blocking function calls hence I could not add the remote
            printers monitor to the existing thread. Hence there is a
            new thread being added to listen to remote printers status
            changes.

            http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/
            <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.01/>

            Thanks and regards,

            Shashi

            *From:*Philip Race
            *Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2018 5:38 AM
            *To:* 2d-dev <2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>
            <mailto:2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>; Shashidhara
            Veerabhadraiah <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
            <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
            *Subject:* Fwd: Re: <Swing Dev> [11] JDK-8153732: Windows
            remote printer changes do not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

            The main concern I have is we now have a busy thread
            burning CPU ..
            bad for laptops .. and if we add a delay we have less
            prompt notification
            of a new local printer.

            I think the compromise is that the existing thread maybe
            kept as is,
            and we add a new thread that pools every 10 minutes for a
            remote printer.

            If we can make the existing thread wake up from its wait
            and do that, even better.

            -phil.

            -------- Original Message --------

            *Subject: *

                

            Re: [11] JDK-8153732: Windows remote printer changes do
            not reflect in lookupPrintServices()

            *Date: *

                

            Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:03:56 -0700

            *From: *

                

            Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
            <mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>

            *Organization: *

                

            Oracle Corporation

            *To: *

                

            Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah
            <shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>
            <mailto:shashidhara.veerabhadra...@oracle.com>

            *CC: *

                

            awt-...@openjdk.java.net
            <mailto:awt-...@openjdk.java.net>,
            swing-...@openjdk.java.net <mailto:swing-...@openjdk.java.net>



            This is on the wrong lists. Not Swing. Not AWT. Should be 2d.
            I'll forward it there and continue there. Consider the
            AWT+Swing threads dead.

            -phil.

            On 6/20/18, 3:12 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote:

                Hi All, Please review this code changes for the below
                enhancement.

                Enhancement:
                https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732

                Webrev:
                http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/
                <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8153732/webrev.00/>

                Details of the changes: Windows provides
                *PrinterChangeNotification* functions that provides
                information about printer status changes of the local
                printers(subset) but not network printers.
                Alternatively, Windows provides a way thro' which one
                can get the network printer status changes by using
                WMI, RegistryKeyChange combination, which is a
                slightly complex mechanism.
                The Windows WMI offers an async and sync method to
                read thro' registry via the WQL query. The async
                method is considered dangerous as it leaves open a
                channel until we close it. But the async method has
                the advantage of being notified of a change in
                registry by calling callback without polling for
                it. The sync method uses the polling mechanism to notify.
                RegistryValueChange cannot be used in combination with
                WMI to get registry value change notification because
                of an error that may be generated because the scope of
                the query would be too big to handle(at times).
                Hence an alternative mechanism is choosen via the
                EnumPrinters by polling for the count of printer
                status changes(add\remove) and based on it update the
                printers list(both local and remote printers - superset).

                Thanks and regards,

                Shashi


Reply via email to