[Resending, because my first mail to2d-dev was blocked with "550 Denied by policy"]
Hi Phil, I've increased the priority of the issue to P2, because it is a serious regression which breaks many applications. And I've requested a backport to 11u as described in the OpenJDK Updates Project push approval process document [1]. And you're totally right - people must finally understand the difference between Oracle- and OpenJDK and why it is so important to have downstream distributions like https://sapmachine.io . We will definitely put this fix into our 11.0.2 release :) Regards, Volker [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/approval.html On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:45 AM Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am sympathetic to those who are affected, but all these questions are > putting us in an impossible position > since you are asking the wrong people. The development engineers are not > the 11u maintainers. > Someone who is in a position to sponsor the change needs to ask the 11u > maintainers if they will accept a request > So I cannot do that on your behalf. If they say yes, then that someone > who asked then needs to fix it. > > But 11.0.2 is baked. So I don't want to get your hopes up for that. > > And not that it applies to contributors such as you, I need to point out > so others understand that these email > lists are for people creating fixes for the main jdk development line, > and not any kind of support channel. > We love getting bug reports, and even better, contributed fixes, but it > is all for the main development line, not for older trains. > > -phil. > > On 12/6/18, 10:55 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This really seems to be a severe issue. > > We have people going from 8 to 11 and immediately reporting > > this issue. So this really is a blocker for them to use 11. > > So it should go to 11.0.2!! > > > > And 11 for sure will be supported in the open for further > > releases. > > > > Best regards, > > Goetz. > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Baesken, Matthias > >> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 1:18 PM > >> To: 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net > >> Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz<goetz.lindenma...@sap.com> > >> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [12] RFR JDK-8212116: IIOException "tEXt > >> chunk length is not proper" on opening png file" > >> > >> Hello , it is important to have the fix in Open JDK 11 as well . > >> > >> My colleague Goetz already commented : > >> > >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212116 > >> > >>> Today one of our application teams going to Java 11 ran into this issue. > >>> Could this still be brought to 11.0.2? > >>> Else I would request a downport to jdk-updates/jdk11u, which would only > >> reach 11.0.3. > >> We support bringing it into 11 . > >> > >> > >> Thanks, Matthias > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Message: 1 > >> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:02:11 +0100 > >> From: Jan Vomlel<jan.vom...@gmail.com> > >> To: 2d-dev@openjdk.java.net > >> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [12] RFR JDK-8212116: IIOException "tEXt > >> chunk length is not proper" on opening png file > >> Message-ID:<436ea89f-d18d-49df-88db-4b3829061...@gmail.com> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"; Format="flowed" > >> > >> Yes, but it is from my point of view critical bug (java 10 readed png > >> files and java 11 many o them not). And java 12 is not released yet. > >> > >> Please consider this. > >> > >> Jan > >> > >> Dne 05.12.2018 v 16:38 Philip Race napsal(a): > >>> OpenJDK has no LTS releases. That's an Oracle JDK thing for which you > >>> need a support contract .. > >>> If you use free OpenJDK you can only use the latest. > >>> Others might provide an LTS but they aren't likely to include random > >>> backports on demand either . > >>> > >>> -phil. > >>> > >>> On 12/5/18, 2:53 AM, Jan Vomlel wrote: > >>>> Thank you Jayathirth for bug resolution. > >>>> > >>>> I think it is ok, but can you fix it also in version 11? It is LTS > >>>> version and we would like to use it for our project. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>
