On 29/05/2019 18:06, Philip Race wrote:
This test does not check. Nor does (IIRC) the implementation,
[1] I guess it is checked in the RasterPrintJob.print() where the code call the
getPrintService(). And getPrintService() returns null if there are no printers installed, as a
result "new PrinterException("No print service found.") is thrown.
I checked this test on win10 w/o printers installed and it pass but throw the
next exception to the log[1]. But if I tries to print from the notepad it
really suggest to install the printer.
because you want an experience like what you would get if you
tried to print from notepad, word, IE, whatever.
Which was to prompt you to install a printer if there is none.
That was the idea "back in the day" and is what happened on XP for sure.>> -
When the test is executed the printer promts the location to where store the pdf file(probably
this location can be set to some default and we will able to test printing as well at someday)
Even on a system with physical printers configured, if a pdf printer is the
default
you could get prompted, but there is no API that I know of that can tell you
this.
I guess we need to documents this, since such "additional" windows from
printers/onenotes etc may affect other tests.
-phil
BTW this windows system was soooo slow so I was not able to move the mouse to
select the file location, and have to reboot it....
-Phil.
On May 29, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
If you try to print when there is no printer the behavior is not strictly
specified.
-Phil.
On May 29, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 29/05/2019 15:16, Philip Race wrote:
It doesn't hang there. It hangs in print().
I guess it is even more strange, it hangs when tries to print to non-existent printer. I guess in
this case the "new PrinterException("No print service found.")" should be
thrown. It looks like a bug, no?
-phil.
On 5/29/19, 3:17 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 29/05/2019 14:09, Phil Race wrote:
think the mystery is not why it times out now, but why it did not do so earlier.
But I assume it if the system does not have the printer then
PrinterJob.getPrinterJob() should not hang?
It looks like the test correctly assume that .getPrinterJob() should returns
something even if there are no printers, and also tries to catch any exceptions
in the print(); I guess its expectation are according the specification, isn't?
--
Best regards, Sergey.
--
Best regards, Sergey.
