So maybe the actual *usage* of C++11 features slows it down.
I found this :-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34179434/is-compiling-with-c11-way-slower-than-with-c98
I really did not even think to measure the build time and I don't
think there's any JDK build parallelism in building a specific native
library.
The build is parallel at a higher level but not at that lower level.
-phil
On 11/17/20, 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Philip Race:
There is more code in the newer version but not 4 times as much !
Harfbuzz now requires c++11 features (-std=c++11)
Possibly the C++ compiler you are using (you don't mention platform) is
slower in this mode.
It's GCC 8 on Debian buster, which defaults to C++14. And it's
possible to write slow-to-compile C++ in all language modes.
Is the Harfbuzz build parallelized?
