well to me some of the older spicelab stuff is quite soulful, that is why i was mentioning it like i said, a lot of newer stuff ive heard is on the hard/progressive trance tip, but the older stuff could be considered techno-trance dustin
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000 11:02:15 +0900 "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >listen now - there is trance that is techno related! > >understand? i dont know where you are coming from but from what i > >understand techno and trance are quite related when it comes to the > core > >of the music > >maybe when you think of trance you think of paul oakenfold or > sasha, you > >know? that is not the trance i am talking about > > It's interesting as 'trance' has changed in its definition over time > so that > a diversity of artists and music from different subcultures and > generations > now goes under that title. I remember someone saying that Waveform > Transmission Vol 1 was 'trancey' - I still don't hear that. But now > when > people say 'techno trance' I think of someone like Timo Maas - > commercial > trance with elements of commercial techno, very derivative. Even Seb > Fontaine is going down that route. It may be a personal thing, but I > ain't > feeling it. And, as for Oliver Lieb, I put him, rightly and wrongly, > in the > same bracket as Moby. I just don't get him at all. The most > soul-less > 'underground' DJ and producer I have ever heard. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
