I usually just say I like the kind of techno that goes boomchigga boomchigga or boomchiggabookachigga boomchiggabookachigga
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle J Dupuy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Shipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:35 PM Subject: RE: [313] blueprint "ENCOUNTERS" {classifications} > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, John Shipman wrote: > > > probably depends who your talking to. "tribal' to one won't be "tribal" to > > another. i find that lots of times the lines between the classifications of > > this and that get blurred. you could definitely use both of these terms to > > describe ho, outline and ruskin. personally i would just like to describe it > > as music, sometimes it seems like categories just get in the way:) > > > of course, classifications exist because they give people convenient > and simple ways to communicate ideas to one another (albeit sometimes at > the cost of accuracy). can you imagine going in to the record store and > asking the clerk, "i'm looking for that kind of sound that goes 'bump, > chicka, bump, chicka. . .'" > > my $.02 > > kyle > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
