To be fair: The film wasn't reviewd because the author of the post had not seen the film at the time. He was basing all of his conclusions off of the trailer that was out at the time... Im a big big fan of the ISM blog, and I generaly steer clear of the minimal...But it's exactly this "general"-ness that has someone writing a review for a film they havent seen...and its this "general"-ness that makes me probably never see this film. Im just as guilty about critizing things I don't know about. This also probably ties in to the Techno in the Masses issue as well. Ant
On Fri, September 4, 2009 2:03 pm, Matt Kane's Brain wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 13:58, David Powers<[email protected]> wrote: >> I should mention the following about the movie itself for this to make >> sense: > > This film got reviewed at ISM back in April: > http://infinitestatemachine.com/2009/04/14/questionable/ > > I know some of the people involved in the production. I have heard so > much about this movie in the past five years that I feel like I don't > even have to go see it. > > -- > matt kane's brain > techno radio at: http://hydrogenproject.com > capoeira in boston http://capoeirageraisboston.com > aim -> mkbatwerk ; y! -> mkb218 ; gtalk -> mkb.dirtyorg >
