it's not a surprise to me, since he calls things as he sees them, and that approach is bound to get at least a few negative responses from the forum responses on ra.
that, and the forum-reading crowd always loves to pick a side (i'm for digital-he's for vinyl!), instead of addressing valid--if directly stated--points that rick addressed. i didn't get a vinyl vs. digital vibe from his answers either. more a noob vs. someone that honed their craft vibe. -wojtek On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1245 > > I'm quite surprised at all the negative feedback both on 313 and RA to > Rick's interview, largely on the basis of his comments about the vinyl / > digital debate in answer to just a few questions out of the whole article. > I thought he came off quite well overall. > > For a remarkably different perspective, check out: > > http://www.littlewhiteearbuds.com/feature/little-white-earbuds-interviews-shed/ > > > m50 > > At 2010.09.23 10:27, kent williams wrote: >> >> As for RA commenters, one should not judge humanity on the comments >> left on blogs & websites. The best thing I can say for a lot of them >> is that at least they're sitting at their computer typing instead of >> going out in the world and actualizing their hatred and ignorance. > >
