>>"they [the artists] choose what others see or hear."
I say not so with repetition, but we all know where I can go with this!! ;) >>"but only that everyone is exposed to the artists output." why not remove the artist from the whole formula? Or how about reducing his/her importance, leveling him/her with the audience - equalling them? >>"then in turn every individual makes up their own mind as to what the artist is saying and is effected by that message." Why block your self from expressing in some attempt to understand another person? First off, it is near impossible to interpret what the artist means to say, *if* he is saying anything at all. Second of all, why be sheep, guided by one man? Everyone has creative power, so why not express it? >>"that is IMO why music is so amazing. One song can mean a million different things to a million differnent people even though they are listening to the same song" this seems a tad contradictory to the above that you wrote. Am I mis-reading it? darw_n "create, demonstrate, toneshift..." search for "djdarwin" on napster www.sphereproductions.com www.mannequinodd.com www.mp3.com/darw_n
