A forwarded message includinf reasons to leave mp3.com

(also 313-artists ;)) written by the www.tokydawn.org:

mp3.com changed their policies some days ago. 
Membership in the 'premium artist service' is now required to 
be able to take part in the 'payback for playback' (p4p) program.
The 'Payback for playback' program divides a certain amount of 
money each month to the best performing artists (means the 
artists with the most downloads).

P4P had a bitter taste right from the start since many 
people were cheating, "trading" and using bots to gain more 
downloads and thus more money.

There have been a lot of discussions taking place on the 
artist-discussion-boards at mp3.com about the changes and it 
seems as if there is a vast amount of different opinions on 
the issue. After we discussed this matter internally, we 
decided to remove the tokyodawn pages from mp3.com. mp3.com 
has been ripping off its artists for some time now, but with 
this change the point has come for us to react, we as 
tokyodawn do not want to represent ourselves at mp3.com any 
longer.

the biggest lie they tell us : mp3.com repeats over and over 
that it's a service site for musicians so they can present 
their music for free and without any cost. That is not true. 
mp3.com is a webportal for listeners who want free and legal 
mp3 music. So what they try to hide from us musicians : we 
deliver their content, the only reason for their existence, 
and their only way to earn any money.

And as you may know, the web changed during the past years. 
Its no longer about "how" or "why", its all about "what". In 
this business, insane amounts of money are paid for content. 
Bill Gates pays loads of money for the exclusive rights to 
digitally publish pictures, drawings and photography with 
his "corbis" company. The whole TimeWarner/AOL (con)fusion 
took place only because AOL badly wanted the movies and 
music TimeWarner holds the copyright of.

So, while all over the world people get paid for creating 
content, mp3.com does not pay a single cent for it and 
furthermore even betrays its content deliverers.

First of all, they don't respect our work and copyright. If 
you sign up for mp3.com, you agree that mp3.com has the 
right to publish and sell all songs you ever uploaded there 
even if you broke the relationship with them a long time 
ago. This means that they can earn money with your old 
material if you become a famous popstar one day, although
they actually never did anything for you. (except those peanuts 
with p4p maybe).
(you dont believe this ? quick link :
http://www.modplug.com/mods/newsdisplay.php3?session=&art=143
the document this article talks about is still the recent one. Every
artist who is signed up on mp3.com agrees to those terms.)

Furthermore, mp3.com is as unimaginably greedy. What is it with 
that payback for playback program ? It has been some lousy 1 
Million Dollar per month for all artists, that's about 
150.000 of them. Now get an idea about the traffic they 
have, the amount of banners all over the place, the money 
they earn with selling information about the users to 
companies such as doubleclick, the spammail, all those partnerships
and licensing programs. Try to imagine what amount of money is 
earned with that.

The next thing is this DAM CD story. They get 50% of the 
price of a CD, fixed. Now why ? You can be sure that they 
will get their expense for manufacturing that CD even if you 
sell it for 6$. This means that an amount of 3$ is enough to 
produce a DAM CD. But since most people sell their CDs for a 
much higher price, they earn more money with those CDs, 
although they do not offer more "value" for you or your listener 
with this higher price. If a commercial CD-fabric 
would demand a higher price for making Ricky Martin CDs than 
for making Mouse on Mars CDs, they would not survive very 
long. mp3.com does exactly that.

And the newest gimmick is "back the band", some sort of 
micropayment system. People give you a dollar and mp3.com 
keeps 50 cent. They get 50% of each donation from your fans ! 
Why ? I guess it costs some 2 cents to direct the donated 
money to the right artist-account and this way mp3.com again 
earns money without doing anything for you or your
listeners.

And now they changed the rules for payback for playback. 
Most people wrote in the artist-forum of mp3.com "yeah, it 
may cost 20 bucks, but the p4p is worth it." So what ? The 
Pot has been 1 Million before, but the difference is now 
that the artists pay themselves. If 50.000 people take 
part mp3.com earns 1 million dollar per month and instantly 
pays it back to the artists. Chances for mp3.com are good 
that this much people will take part, especially since those 
fake-payments took place. Artists suddenly got money through 
the p4p program, only some 3 or 4 bucks, but its obvious 
that mp3.com wants to tell them "you see, it works". Most of 
these artists will never reach the 50$ which are needed to 
get the money finally transferred to their bank-account, but 
the decoy works so far. And you cant get out of it easily,
you will have to stick with that program for 6 months even
if you will not earn those 20$ you pay them each month.
Furthermore, if you are not part of the premium service, your
only way to find out is to sign up and pay those 20$ for each month,
because they wont tell you how much money you could have made
if you had that premium membership.

The conclusion is they want us to deliver the content and 
pay them money for getting a small share of the big money 
they earn with this content.

On the other hand, mp3.com even cuts the support for the 
artists, to maximize the money they earn and they show in a 
very obvious way that they are not interested in the 
artists, they are only interested in the plain 
mp3-files and their stockshares.

The bigger mp3.com gets, the fewer people seem to work 
there. At the beginning, song approvals took some hours, now 
we are at 7 days most of the time. In the beginning, artists 
could explain their idea and their opinion, because all the 
info was on one html-page. Since the redesign, visitors see 
only the mp3 files, for any background  info on the band, 
photos, more detailed explanation and such they have to use 
the tab at the top of the screen and we guess most do not.

The reason for all this rip-off is the never ending need of 
mp3.com for money.

They tell us that it's expensive to maintain such a site. 
That's true. They tell us that it's expensive to care for all 
the musicians. Although its hard to get a human reply if you 
send them an e-mail since they installed all those mailbots 
sending out links to faq-pages, that may be true too.

But you need to realize one thing : they have the biggest 
collection of free, legal mp3-files in the world. They are 
already using every possible way to get the most money from 
the artists and the listeners. They have loads of visitors. 
So there should be enough money.

The real reason for mp3.coms need for money is different. 

First, they did stupid stuff. They established my.mp3.com 
which was offering copyrighted music from signed artists all 
over the world. The big companies got angry and sued 
mp3.com, they lost the case and now have to pay a lot of 
money. That's bad luck, but the question that remains is 
"why does this money have to be paid by us independent 
musicians and our listeners ?" They did never ask me about 
my opinion about my.mp3 and I did never ask them to open up 
my.mp3. So, they did screw it up for themselves and now they 
shall fix it for themselves.

The other big change was the arrival of mp3.com at the 
stockmarket. If you  still need proof that mp3.com is not 
about music or egality or anything like that, there it is. 
The whole purpose of mp3.com is to "perform well", make 
loads of money and maximize the value of the stocks.

tokyodawn appeared on mp3.com more than 2 years ago. We used 
mp3.com to reach a different audience and direct them to our 
homepage and we did use the payback for playback program to 
get the money for the domains and other expenses we have (we 
are still non-commercial as you know and this was our only 
small income).

But with these recent changes we cannot represent ourselves 
any longer on mp3.com, because this company now stands for 
many attributes we deny : greed, lack of respect and 
bitching for the stockmarket. mediahustling.

tokyodawn records,  bureau of education. 04/23/01

www.tokyodawn.org

--
Links :

the official announcement of mp3.com : 

http://www.mp3.com/payback/

--

mp3.com on finance.yahoo : 

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=mppp&d=v3

interesting to see how the stockmarket thinks about it

--

the artist agreement of mp3.com : 

http://www.mp3.com/newartist/agree.html

mp3.com has removed or redirected every link to that 
document. You still declare that you have read and 
accepted these terms when you sign up for mp3.com, but you 
will actually never see those terms. 

--

an article about that agreement, explaining how the daily 

rip-off is being legalized with lawyers-terms : 

http://www.modplug.com/mods/newsdisplay.php3?session=&art=143

--

an article about the reason why one of their latest gimmicks, the
licensing promotion sucks :

http://musicdish.com/mag/?id=3412

--
these 10 minutes of political education have been brought to you
by looza and prymer of tokyodawn. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
---------------------------
LoveThemPlanetZ
peoplez
plantz
peaze
pluz
m                   
------------------------------------------------------------------


GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net

Reply via email to