I agree with Hans. Nost's predisctions are so damn vague that this could be talking about anything. I really doubt that his original writing said the word "York". I'm sure that that is someone interpretation. And, finally, I'm sure that no 2 interpretations are the same, so people are basically getting all worked up over someone elses opinion on wht Nostradamus meant.
One more thing. Nost made thousands of so-called predictions and most of them are dead wrong. If your chances of winning the lottery are 1,000,000:1 and you buy 1,000,000 tickets, don't you think that one of them would be a winner? My point is, that it may just be pure chance that Nost is VAGUELY correct on some of his predictions when he makes so many (books full) of them... On Thu, 13 September 2001, Hans Veneman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:59:05PM +0100, Stewart Caig wrote: > > Thought some of you might be interested in reading this prediction from > > Nostrodamus.....Pretty freaky! > > What i find freaky is that so many people are willing to believe that this > text > was written in the middle ages, while it was written 5 years ago by a > Canadian > high school student as part of a Critical Analysis of Nostradamus. > > http://fury.com/article/925.php > > Hans > > -- > Hans Veneman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://technotourist.org > http://www.TV-99-AD.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TJ www.wireframerecords.com www.outrecords.com ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart. http://www.peoplepc.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
