Hmmm. This is  - err, 'unwise,' to put a response in the temperate language
which you appear to have left at home today, Techno.

One: you don't know wtf I or anyone was listening to as a kid.

Two: I listened to Landstrumm in the early-mid 90's and I listened to
D'Angelo and and Guy (Check "Her" for some real hi-tech funk) and a Guy
called Gerald. If you transported me back even earlier, my taste were
similarly diverse. In '84, I put Wood Beez by Scritti Politti on the
record-changer, my cousin put Man Parrish ... I put D Train, he put
Cybotron. To me the seams were non-existent. But that's just me. (I.e. there
were many more like me, and many not like me). I was also into the Smiths
(before Morrisey turned into an arse) New Order, Echo & The Bunnymen,
Bananarama (not for the best reasons I admit) Cabaret Voltaire, Bowie, The
Stones, The Faces, Velvet Undergound, Grace Jones, NY '60s garage rock ...
et al.

Just to bring things right up to date, my top picks for the year included
stuff from Kanzleramt but also Recloose - and I also bought and enjoyed
India Irie's LP.

And I'm not unique by far! Therefore I think you're  - 'somewhat mistaken'.

k



>-----Original Message-----
>From: techno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:01 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: (313) What! Nothing about Lost? (rant)
>
>
>The nostalgia trend is getting old. (no pun intended)
>Mojo, Larry Levan, Ron Hardy, italo-disco, deephousepage, ect.. ect..
>All you people that used to be into minimal techno, landstrum that type of
>stuff in the mid 90's and didn't grow up listening to black music and
>now you think you know everything about "soul" or your Mr. "deep house".
>
>YOU SUCK.
>
>fake trendy ass superficial people.
>
>on 1/6/03 5:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Sorry to be the party pooper, but I thought that the LOST christmas
>> party was a bit disappointing, certainly not unique musically. I
>> recently got hold of a mix by Mills taped from his 'Wizard' radio
>> show. The mix was incredible, a full on fusion of go-go, early house
>> and hip hop mixed at lightning speed complete with mad scratching
>> skills. I had hoped for some more of this action at LOST so I was  a
>> bit disappointed by the rather pedestrian mix of funk and disco that
>> didn't seem at all fresh. This might just be because I'm very
>> familiar with that music and am quite jaded towards it, but I wasn't
>> feeling it that night. The fact that Mills and Slater (rather than an
>> unknown DJ in practically any semi-trendy bar you might visit on a
>> weekday evening in London these days) were putting the needle on the
>> records wasn't enough. I also think that B&T was a poor venue - the
>> long thin shape of the upstairs room is a natural obastacle to
>> generating a good vibe. Where was Steve Stasis?
>>
>> Nonetheless, nice one to LOST for breaking away from the huge party
>> route and doing  something a bit different, however, for small
>> parties, SLICES still wins hands down.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Quit surprised that nobody of the London area 313-ers did not post
>>> anything about the last Lost party... I thought it was an amazing
>>> and unique party. How often can you hear in a 300 people venue Steve
>>> Bicknell, Luke Slater and Jeff Mills play back to back (kinda) with
>>> just soul, funk, disco and 80's house music? The most modern record
>>> that Jeff Mills dropped was Move Your Body from Marshal Jefferson!
>>> The rest of his records where stuff like Loose Joints, Dan Hartman,
>>> O'Jays, Sylvester JD's etc. It was maybe a little bit to full to
>>> dance nicely (well there was not really a dancefloor anyway) but
>>> still i thought it was one of the best parties i have been to in a
>>> long while
>>>
>>>
>>> ... and it is a bit of old news but the Bleep43 New years eve party
>>> was brilliant, never had so much fun on NY eve! Bleep43 for
>>> president! :) and more boring news, Tristan, you rock!
>>>
>>> --
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to