Granted, sometimes an imaginiative mix can make you re-evaluate a record
that you had previously dismissed, especially if it completely
contrasts/clashs with the other record but as you say, to mix crap in just
to make a splash is lame IMHO.

-----Original Message-----
From: Emile Facey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Robert Taylor; 'spw'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: (313) Over-production (WAS - Re: (313) Suburban Knight)


Can someone define what "good" means? I agree that a DJ should play (and be
allowed to play) ANYTHING that they think works in the context of a mix, but
I don't see any point in playing crap just to get a reaction. Isn't it more
of a challenge to play something off the wall and keep people ON the dance
floor?



 

> From: Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:36:41 -0000
> To: "'spw'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
> Subject: RE: (313) Over-production (WAS - Re: (313) Suburban Knight)
> 
> Throw people off the dance floor, you mean?
> Because a crap record is still a crap record no matter how you juxtapose
it
> with another one.
> It might be a novelty to hear some ridiculous records mixed together the
> first time round but that soon palls (look at the bootleg craze), so why
> bother? To look clever? To annoy people? Or is this some kind of
avant-garde
> dada experiment to challenge our expectations? ;-)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: (313) Over-production (WAS - Re: (313) Suburban Knight)
> 
> 
> What's the challenge in mixing only "good" records?
> Mix anything that works, if you can be clever and mix a cheesy
> trance track with a techno track why not do it just to throw people
> off?
> 
> 
> on 2/4/03 7:45 AM, Robert Taylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> Why would somebody want do that in the first place? ie mix a crap record
>> with a good record.
>> I prefer to hear a good DJ mix a good record with another good record and
>> make them sound even better.
>> Surely that's the whole point of mixing?
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jongsma, K.J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:44 PM
>> To: 'spw'; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: (313) Over-production (WAS - Re: (313) Suburban Knight)
>> 
>> 
>> a good dj can 
>>> mix a Paul
>>> Okenfold record or some pop dance record with an underground
>>> techno record
>>> and make it sound cool.
>> 
>> No he can't.... :)
> 
> 
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily
> represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
> stated.  This email and any files transmitted are confidential and
intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are
addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
stated.  This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to