Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks on tracklists, or
not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of triviality on this list,
till now!!

¦-D

>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List
>Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations
>
>
>the reason for putting the year of release in a track listing is the same
>reason that track listings mention the artist, title, record label and mix.
>it's information that is useful for those that want to track it down.
>james
>
>
>> |
>> |
>> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500
>> | > To: [email protected]
>> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations
>> | >
>> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, isnt that very
>> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno conversation about what is
>> | > techno, they all suck.  Go to Submerge or something and ask mike
>> | > banks.    The basic fact is there is good music and bad, and
>> | > acoustic music and electronic music.  Thats it.  Cant you guys go
>> | > back to talking about new records and old records????? what is this
>> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone!  And of course Missy Elliot is at
>> | > least a little techno.  That isnt just hand drums behind her
>> | > vocals.  And Adam beyer is also techno, its just pounding.  Its
>> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no disrespect.  Id rather
>> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May or any other
>> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and when is Derrick
>> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit the shiznit,
>> | > save it for your toilets
>> |
>> |
>>
>

Reply via email to