too many hatas

not enough playas

(yep, this is 313 at its best)

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Alex Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 18 February 2003 13:47
| To: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 
| Mailing List
| Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| ((year2003))
| 
| 
| too many chin strokers
| 
| not enuff panty peelers
| 
| ab
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" <[email protected]>
| Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:18 AM
| Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing 
| topic) ((year2003))
| 
| 
| That's probably why there's not many Ladies in the "electronic" music
| industry. Too many geeks not enough "stardom".
| 
| Rob Jarvis
| 
| Victoria Music Ltd.
| Unit 215 old gramaphone works
| 326 Kensal Road
| London
| W10 5BZ
| + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
| + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
| 
| http://www.victoria-music.com
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
| 
| pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + 
| housedust + nepenta +
| u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique 
| + hypercubic +
| radio sonic + neon + feedback
| 
| > From: robin pinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:44:32 +0000 (GMT)
| > To: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Cc: [email protected]
| > Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing 
| topic) ((year
| 2003))
| >
| >
| >
| > we're all geeks.....this is an email discussion forum after all.
| >
| >
| > embrace your geekdom, don't deny it.
| >
| > :)
| >
| > robin...
| >
| >
| >> Hmmm...
| >> I'm guessing that if a bad Techno record is mixed at a 
| party while geeks
| are
| >> discussing it, that makes it Detroit.
| >>
| >> Rob Jarvis
| >>
| >> Victoria Music Ltd.
| >> Unit 215 old gramaphone works
| >> 326 Kensal Road
| >> London
| >> W10 5BZ
| >> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
| >> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
| >>
| >> http://www.victoria-music.com
| >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
| >>
| >> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust +
| nepenta +
| >> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds 
| unique + hypercubic
| +
| >> radio sonic + neon + feedback
| >>
| >>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:34:37 +1300
| >>> To: "'Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
| >>> "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
| >>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>
| >>> im confused now...does the year or the music make the 
| techno good or
| bad, or
| >>> does it all hinge on the geeks discussion...
| >>>
| >>> -----Original Message-----
| >>> From: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd. 
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 2:24 a.m.
| >>> To: Ralf Gill; 313 Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>> Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>
| >>>
| >>> LOL.
| >>> that's more like it. discussing a geek's party is quite 
| geeky in itself.
| >>> and as we all know there are good discussions and bad discussions.
| (2003)
| >>>
| >>> Rob Jarvis
| >>>
| >>> Victoria Music Ltd.
| >>> Unit 215 old gramaphone works
| >>> 326 Kensal Road
| >>> London
| >>> W10 5BZ
| >>> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
| >>> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
| >>>
| >>> http://www.victoria-music.com
| >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
| >>>
| >>> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust +
| nepenta +
| >>> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique +
| hypercubic +
| >>> radio sonic + neon + feedback
| >>>
| >>>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >>>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:49:18 +1300
| >>>> To: "'Brendan Nelson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
| "'[email protected]'"
| >>>> <[email protected]>
| >>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>>
| >>>> Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more 
| relevant, like I went
| to a
| >>>> party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and 
| although the
| party
| >>> and
| >>>> all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told 
| the hospital the
| >>> year
| >>>> they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like
| this...
| >>>>
| >>>> -----Original Message-----
| >>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m.
| >>>> To: Ralf Gill; ::); [email protected]
| >>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>> That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good 
| parties and
| bad
| >>>> parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin 
| geeked out...
| :)
| >>>>
| >>>> | -----Original Message-----
| >>>> | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>> | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42
| >>>> | To: '::)'; '[email protected]'
| >>>> | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | -----Original Message-----
| >>>> | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>> | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m.
| >>>> | To: 313 Mailing List
| >>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | This party, what year was it ?
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | >ok so hi
| >>>> |
| >>>> | >we should end this and talk about something else.
| >>>> |
| >>>> | what about the new hawtin and vath album?  I never heard
| >>>> | anyone talk about
| >>>> | it
| >>>> |
| >>>> | anyone wanna have a party?
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | -Joe
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | ----- Original Message -----
| >>>> | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >>>> | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell"
| >>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 
| Mailing List"
| >>>> | <[email protected]>
| >>>> | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM
| >>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations
| >>>> |
| >>>> |
| >>>> | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do 
| tracks just
| stand
| >>>> | alone,
| >>>> | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when
| >>>> | a track was
| >>>> | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by
| >>>> | the scene
| >>>> | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play.
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a
| little
| >>>> | dated.
| >>>> | > They still retain some of their original power,  but now
| >>>> | can be seen as
| >>>> | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the
| >>>> | dispute arose
| >>>> | over
| >>>> | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings
| >>>> | with (2001),
| >>>> | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still
| >>>> | I like to
| >>>> | trace
| >>>> | > an artist's development, so for me it's important 
| information.
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | > Just my tuppence,
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | > Andrew
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | > ----- Original Message -----
| >>>> | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >>>> | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
| >>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313
| >>>> | > Mailing List" <[email protected]>
| >>>> | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM
| >>>> | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | >
| >>>> | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks
| >>>> | on tracklists,
| >>>> | or
| >>>> | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of
| >>>> | triviality on this
| >>>> | > list,
| >>>> | > > till now!!
| >>>> | > >
| >>>> | > > ¦-D
| >>>> | > >
| >>>> | > > >-----Original Message-----
| >>>> | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>> | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM
| >>>> | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List
| >>>> | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations
| >>>> | > > >
| >>>> | > > >
| >>>> | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track
| >>>> | listing is the
| >>>> | same
| >>>> | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title,
| >>>> | record label and
| >>>> | > mix.
| >>>> | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to
| >>>> | track it down.
| >>>> | > > >james
| >>>> | > > >
| >>>> | > > >
| >>>> | > > >> |
| >>>> | > > >> |
| >>>> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>> | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500
| >>>> | > > >> | > To: [email protected]
| >>>> | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations
| >>>> | > > >> | >
| >>>> | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists,
| >>>> | isnt that very
| >>>> | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno
| >>>> | conversation about what
| >>>> | is
| >>>> | > > >> | > techno, they all suck.  Go to Submerge or
| >>>> | something and ask mike
| >>>> | > > >> | > banks.    The basic fact is there is good music
| >>>> | and bad, and
| >>>> | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music.  Thats it.
| >>>> | Cant you guys go
| >>>> | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old
| >>>> | records????? what is
| >>>> | this
| >>>> | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone!  And of course
| >>>> | Missy Elliot is
| >>>> | at
| >>>> | > > >> | > least a little techno.  That isnt just hand drums
| >>>> | behind her
| >>>> | > > >> | > vocals.  And Adam beyer is also techno, its just
| >>>> | pounding.  Its
| >>>> | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no
| >>>> | disrespect.  Id rather
| >>>> | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May
| >>>> | or any other
| >>>> | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and
| >>>> | when is Derrick
| >>>> | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit
| >>>> | the shiznit,
| >>>> | > > >> | > save it for your toilets
| >>>> | > > >> |
| >>>> | > > >> |
| >>>> | > > >>
| >>>> | > > >
| >>>> | >
| >>>> |
| >>
| >>
| >
| > robin...
| > 
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| > Dr. Robin Pinning                               | E: 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Manchester Computing, University of Manchester, | T:  +44 
| 161 275 7028
| > Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.            | F:  +44 
| 161 275 6040
| > 
--------------------------www.mrccs.man.ac.uk-------------------------
>



Reply via email to