I wouldn't normally dare to try to understand (let alone explain) the logic applied by a lot of the regulars on there, but I suspect that they would say that while some parts of the internet are "ghetto" (eg their forum), other parts aren't (eg the 313 list)...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 May 2003 16:07 > To: Langsman, Marc; Brendan Nelson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) RE: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with > Kir k Degiorgio > > > does that mean the internet is 'ghetto' or not? > > ab > > -----Original Message----- > From: Langsman, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:24 AM > To: 'Brendan Nelson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) RE: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with > Kir k Degiorgio > > > > Haha yeah yeah - I mentioned final scratch on the > ghettotech.de forum and > got repeatedly flamed for 'non-ghettoness' :/ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 3:46 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: (313) RE: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX > > with Kirk Degiorgio > > > > > > I like the term "third wave dj" actually! :) > > > > Lots of recorded ghetto-tech mixes are done in hotmix style, > > that's true, but it kind of remains that the ghetto-tech > > scene is probably the most hostile to new techniques and > > methods for DJing. You can just imagine the chorus of > > disapproval on the ghettotech.de forum if, god forbid, > > Godfather was spotted with a laptop hidden behind the decks! > > But at the same time the overwhelming majority of ghetto-tech > > mixes are made digitally. > > > > When you are doing a high-tech mix, though, you do have to > > think like a ghetto-tech DJ - what noise can I put in *right > > here* that will make this a bit better? What can I personally > > do to keep the listener interested during this rather boring > > bridge part of a track? Should I just let this whole track > > play out, or shall I whip out a second copy and cut straight > > to the good bit at the end? > > > > That sort of thing needs to be going through your head all > > the time if you're using digital technology, I would say. If > > you find yourself just sitting there with mouse hovering over > > track title for five minutes, waiting for the tune to play > > out, you're not really getting into the spirit of things... > > > > This thread is a bit on the waffly side, but f*ck it; with > > everyone going to Movement this weekend, the list would just > > die on its feet if there weren't a few us prepared to step > > into the breach and start talking bo**ocks! > > > > Brendan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 23 May 2003 15:33 > > > To: Brendan Nelson > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk > > > Degiorgio > > > > > > > > > > > > another point: > > > > > > the hi-tech dj ("third wave dj"?, have i been reading too > > > much? :)) has > > > to approach selection in a similar way to a ghetto-tech dj. > > using two > > > copies to do your own edit/effects, using just small > > snippets of some > > > tracks juggled over the top of a beat track to create a new > > > one, that kind > > > of thing. and of course a lot of recorded ghetto-tech > mixes are done > > > hotmix style. > > > > > > i've just realised i'm wittering on too much and a lot of the > > > US people > > > are prepping to go to Movement. Lucky B******s! :) > > > > > > i'll shut up now > > > > > > robin... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > -- > This message is intended only for the personal and > confidential use of the > designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the > intended recipient > of this message you are hereby notified that any review, > dissemination, > distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This > communication is for information purposes only and should not > be regarded as > an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial > product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as > an official > statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be > guaranteed to be > secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that > this information > is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All > information is subject to change without notice. > > > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 > >
