There is no point in doing "LFO" again if they are not going to do
"LFO" again(at least in a similar vein).
If they are going to do something else then it would probably be a good
idea to use a different moniker since LFO is so, well, LFO
It would be like Hawtin using the Plastikman moniker to do FUSE stuff
or vice-versa.
On a more serious note I hope this has those signature sub basslines
and
old school technoid
flavor.
It doesn't. He already did that album - what's wrong with just
listening to
that, if it's all you want? He's also done a few better albums since
then.
Tristan
