sorry guys..... i guess my head is still in bed. i meant dreck004 - Secondo: It's Okay I've Overstood as stated in the hardawax 128.2 back in stock mail out.
sorry for the confusion guys and thanks for your help fab ----- Original Message ----- From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:15 AM Subject: RE: (313) Dreck 003 - Secondo - your'e the one > Wrong Dreck. Fabrizio means (I think) Dreck 002 'It's alright, I've > Overstood'. That's wicked. It's cut up house but it develops into something > which sounds like NY house Timmy Regisford style, just by the way it's done. > Very impressive - and a bit cracked. > > k > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: derb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:49 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: AW: (313) Dreck 003 - Secondo - your'e the one > > > > > >i like it a lot :) > > > >there's a little sample on boomkat: > >http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?merchID=11332 > > > >cheers, > >d > > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >Von: Fabrizio Nahum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 10:50 > >An: [email protected] > >Betreff: (313) Dreck 003 - Secondo - your'e the one > > > > > >Dreck 003 - has anyone heard this? the hardwax description (yes, i know i > >must take record shop descriptions with a grain of salt...:) states that it > >is "excellent minimal house between Akufen and Theo Parrish - TIP!" - and > >that has definitely tickled my fancy, as they say.... > > > >thanks > > > >fab > > > > > > > > >
