I like a bit of both if I'm honest, I want to know what shoes, contact
lenses and lager Mr. Hawtin is using while he twiddling with dynamic
modulation, burning EEPROM and whistling across his portamento...

md



5/9/03 3:09 PM Quest [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Okay Rob - I apologise for being defensive. I like the techy speak in reviews,
> but it is not for everyone you are right. These reviewers need to walk a fine
> line here.
> 
> Really my point is slightly related though really about interviews. I do think
> there should be more emphasis on the music and equipment and less on lifestyle
> in interviews with producers, I'm interested to see if anyone else agrees.
> 
> Quest Pond
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 05 September 2003 4:49 PM
>> To: Quest Pond; Tom Churchill; Lee Herrington IV; 313
>> Subject: RE: (313) Excuse my ignorance... pad sound?
>> 
>> 
>> Not being a producer or a DJ, I couldn't give two figs how
>> something is made, I just wanna hear it. Maybe I should give
>> a sh!t but it bores me when I hear such talk.  I wasn't
>> talking about interviews anyway, I was talking about reviews
>> and if I can't understand what the reviewer is referring to
>> when he's talking about "gates" and "flanges", I'm not going
>> to get a good idea of what it sounds like. Not that I pay
>> much attention to reviews anyway - I tend to just use them as
>> a guide to what's out.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Quest Pond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:42 PM
>> To: Robert Taylor; Tom Churchill; Lee Herrington IV; 313
>> Subject: RE: (313) Excuse my ignorance... pad sound?
>> 
>> 
>> I hate to bring this up but i totally disagree with Rob, I
>> think too many interview are non technical.
>> 
>> This might be quite controversial but I see little point
>> about asking producers about the weather, politics and the
>> club scene. Might it be the case that the main source of
>> inspiration is racks full of funky analog equipment? Or a mad
>> sound made by feedback loops?
>> 
>> What is important is the music and how they made it, not what
>> colour underwear they have.
>> 
>> Personally i want equipment and methods, am i the only one
>> who feels like this?
>> 
>> 
>> Quest Pond
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 05 September 2003 12:43 PM
>>> To: Tom Churchill; Lee Herrington IV; 313
>>> Subject: RE: (313) Excuse my ignorance... pad sound?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I wondered what that meant - I've always read about "lush
>>> pads" in techno reviews, especially of Detroit sh!t.
>>> I hate the fact that many electronic music reviews assume you
>>> know all about the technology involved in making the music.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:40 AM
>>> To: Lee Herrington IV; 313
>>> Subject: Re: (313) Excuse my ignorance... pad sound?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> hi folks.  i've read the term, "pad sound", from time to
>>> time on this
>>>> list.  could someone provide me with a definition of this phrase?
>>> 
>>> In synthesiser terminology, a pad is a sustained, warm,
>>> string-like sound
>>> normally heard in long chords. Synthetic strings, basically...
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>> ##############################################################
>>> #######################
>>> Note:
>>> 
>>> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do
>>> not necessarily represent
>>> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
>>> specifically stated. This email
>>> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
>>> solely for the use of the
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
>>> received this email in
>>> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>>> Thank You.
>>> ##############################################################
>>> #######################
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ##############################################################
>> #######################
>> Note:
>> 
>> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do
>> not necessarily represent
>> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
>> specifically stated. This email
>> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended
>> solely for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
>> received this email in
>> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> Thank You.
>> ##############################################################
>> #######################
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to