I personally don't have a problem with the
A&H having gain controls on the back.  If 
one record is quieter than another all you
have to do is adjust the gains whilst your 
cueing up which takes a couple of seconds.  
The LED 'channel' lights give you an accurate
enough idea of when the volumes on both 
records match.

Chris.
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2003/11/20 Thu PM 06:04:02 GMT
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: (313) OT: A & H mixers [was Re: (313) richie hawtin in wired 
> magazine]
> 
> I've only used an Xone 32 twice, but I hate having the gains back there.  I
> prefer to have the main faders at max to allow for easier cuts, so I
> generally cue a track at one volume and then back off a notch or so before
> dropping it in, then gradually bring it up to match the other track.
> Reaching around the back of the mixer to do this is a pain in the ass in my
> opinion.  Other than that, I think the layout is great and the LFO is pretty
> fun once you muck about with it for a bit.  Never used one of the higher-end
> A&H mixers, but I'd love to give them a shot -- unfortunately they're just a
> little price-prohibitive in my book.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> "Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "313" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 5:22 AM
> Subject: Re: (313) richie hawtin in wired magazine
> 
> 
> > All down to space on the front panel, you can set the gain while you're
> > cueing up and shouldn't need to tweak it, whereas the EQs, sends, filter
> > etc. all need to be closer to hand while in the mix. Before I got a Xone
> 32
> > I thought it was a stupid place to have the gains, but after a week or so
> of
> > getting used to it I've never given it another thought. It's just a great
> > sounding well built piece of kit.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "313" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: (313) richie hawtin in wired magazine
> >
> >
> > > Why are the gains on the back tho"
> > >
> > >
> > > 20/11/03 10:29 AM Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > I'll back that one up- the A+H mixers are the only DJ mixers I've ever
> > > > used where you can actually BOOST frequencies with the EQ and it
> > > > doesn't sound harsh- they have  anew mixer out new month with a big
> > > > launch party at Cargo in London- I'll let you all know what its like
> > > > once I've seen it.
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > >
> > > > Jason Brunton
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> The A&H mixer has awesome sound quality, and comprises of top end
> > > >> compenents
> > > >> throughout.
> > > >> The EQ is 4 way too, and from my own experience, allows much
> > > >> creativity in
> > > >> the mix, not to mention tighter control of the sound.
> > > >> The facilities (ranging from Aux Send/Return, Filters etc) are also
> top
> > > >> notch.
> > > >> In short- I have never used anything better.
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> Sent: 19 November 2003 9:49
> > > >> To: m a t t [d]
> > > >> Cc: [email protected]
> > > >> Subject: Re: (313) richie hawtin in wired magazine
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, m a t t [d] wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/
> > > >>> 0,1412,61273,00.html?tw=wn_story_top5
> > > >>>
> > > >>> interesting about his modified allen and heath mixer
> > > >>>
> > > >>> sorry if this has been posted before...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> matt :)
> > > >>
> > > >> a couple of comments:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1.  i didn't think itunes had dance music from independent labels....
> > > >>
> > > >> 2.  people talk about how hawtin (and others) simply play the same
> set
> > > >> over and over again, or at least variations of that set.  it isn't
> > > >> hard to
> > > >> understand why this dynamic occurs given his travel itinerary.
> doesn't
> > > >> mean it is RIGHT...but it IS understandable.
> > > >>
> > > >> 3.  i'm not familiar with the allen and heath mixer.  what does he
> gain
> > > >> from modifying IT as opposed to a standard say, GEMINI?  (*ducks*)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> peace
> > > >> lks
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ***********************************************************************
> > > >> ****************
> > > >> Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
> > > >> not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies.
> > > >> This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies
> > > >> and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
> > > >> transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the
> > > >> use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
> > > >> attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To" or "Cc"
> > > >> lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for
> > > >> delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended
> > > >> recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an
> > > >> unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.
> > > >>
> > > >> If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager
> > > >> by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to
> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please
> > > >> then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies
> > > >> thereof.  Thank you.
> > > >>
> ***********************************************************************
> > > >> ****************
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

-----------------------------------------
Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/


Reply via email to