using pyslsk under osx requires installation of the
mac developer tools (free) and a loooong time spent
unpacking and installing all kinds of python
gibberish.  despite the time it's pretty easy if you
follow the instructions on the boards -- and it works.
 have never tried the others.

--- Scotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from my understanding you can run slsk on a mac os
> x.2+.
> there are two clients i am aware of nicotine and
> pysoulseek i guess there
> are now three i giving this slskX a chance. d/l
> right now.
> 
> i have read that nicotine runs the best and here is
> the addie
> but i have not tried either yet, do not have the
> time. both these are linux
> clients and do not understand that os. i did find a
> guide but have not
> looked over it yet.
> 
> http://nicotine.thegraveyard.org/
> this is a guide for nicotine on os x
> http://members.cox.net/akbackup/nicotine/index.htm
> 
> http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/
> 
> let me know if it works i keep this pc around for
> slsk and would love to use
> my mac for it.
> 
> scotto
> lansing, mi.
> plaztikjezuz.com
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "jonathan morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jason Brunton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Robert
> Taylor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "313" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:49 AM
> Subject: Re: (313) re: soulseek for mac was michael
> mayer mixing was
> re:fabric live thread
> 
> 
> > SoulseekX
> >
> > http://www.versiontracker.com
> >
> > > From: Jason Brunton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:51:36 +0000
> > > To: "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: 313 <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: (313) re: michael mayer mixing was
> re: fabric live thread
> > >
> > > If its that good I'll eat them with a side order
> of humble pie and a
> > > sprinkling of humour and humility! 
> Unfortunately I'm on a Mac and
> > > don't have access to Soulseek!  Obsessed is a
> truly timeless piece of
> > > music though- looking forward to the new album
> later this year!!!
> 
> 

Reply via email to