On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, J. T. wrote:
> not only is there no real new generation of black techno, but i mean matthew > dear...who cares if he's popular, does it really have any soul or connection > to the character of classic detroit techno? not that i can hear...just > happens to be from detroit.. does it have any SOUL, you ask??? have you listened to his music, or just tracked through it because it was a detroit artist, and since it didnt sound like "no UFOs" or "strings of life" or "jaguar" you decided it was not worthy of being catagorized as a detroit record? god, do i get tired of this generalization. why, OH WHY does everything have to sound like a modern day submerge record to be labeled "detroit techno" anymore? dont people realize that most of the records that defined (notice the past tense, that most cant seem to let go of) detroit techno, were produced 12-21 years ago, and there shouldve been TONS of evolution in that time period? perfect example: shake. shakes been around from the get go, but has continuously evolved. shakes records sound like shake records. not because of similar sounds used, but because he has a specific style.. a certain brand of soul. are you going to tell me that the only reason shakes music has soul, is because hes black and from detroit??? in my opinion, those 2 factors are secondary factors. shakes music has soul, because shake has soul. the fact that matthew is white has nothing to do with the soul of his music. if you think that, then you better be thinking the same about joy division, liquid liquid, francois k, or recloose, even. everything matthew has produced has come straight from his soul. alot of it is downright moving too. listen to "some new depression" from the ghostly 'Idol Tryouts' comp. first time i heard that track in its entirety, it nearly brought me to tears... the same way derrick mays "icon" does to me. i hope that one day people will understand these points better. derek.
