And you're all taking me far too seriously.
"Robert Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Dan Bean" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,
4.co.uk> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[email protected]>
03/04/04 09:38 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: (313) Big
Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
the Original Hot Mix 5)
It's the old confusion between 'funny ha ha' and 'funny peculiar' -
personally I find it sidesplittingly pantwettingly hilarious, but I'm
weird.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
the Original Hot Mix 5)
Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an alternative to.
Could you explain what you mean a bit, or am I taking a joke to literally
(again)? :)
You wrote:
>
> >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
> definition obsessed trainspotters.
>
> I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed - more like a
> slightly unhealthy preoccupation with objects and figures that nobody e=
> lse
> really cares for.
> And, I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you about you finding it
> "funny". Entertaining maybe - perplexing possibly - deviant most likely=
> -
> but "funny" it is not.
>
> just my 2=A2
>
> MEK=
>
>
>
#####################################################################################
Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
#####################################################################################
