>i simply meant 'faux' not meaning insincere, but just resorting to modesty
>when its by no means nessesary.
Ah - squared
I read that and thought "what the?!"
;)
>again- not really trying to argue that point. but i think its a fair
>estimate that the dj kicks overshadows in terms of popularity. just a
>hunch.
true - the mix is more popular in part because, from my experiences, it's
difficult to find many of Claude's releases.
The Djax series are fairly easy but they always seem to be in the bins -
don't know if people just aren't taking the time
to listen to them?
>> the one thing is - listening to his mixes is not half as good as
watching
>> him DJ
>here's where you maybe lose me. you make it sound as if what you hear
>isn't as important as how he looks when djin. or maybe you meant to say
>that getting to watch him adds an extra element to make it even better.
your second choice is the right one
after seeing Claude mix - and he went full out tricks and all - it's like
watching Jackson Pollock paint as opposed to just looking at his paintings
the movement becomes part of the art
If I listen to his mixes I can't help but picture what he's doing
physically
his mixes can still stand on their own but watching him adds another
dimension to understanding his style and approach to the art of DJing
no arguments here
MEK
