i'm quite certain Jesus BMH was after Psalm 69. Not that you shouldn't like it...
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Robert Taylor wrote: > Well said yussel - Psalm 69 was a disappointment to me - too conventional for > me. The last thing I liked of theirs was Jesus Built My Hotrod > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:39 PM > To: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) Ministry was Re: (313) Playlist WNUR Chicago - 7 May > 2004 - download it > > > funny- most people i know regard psalm 69 as the ministry album that > jumped-the-shark. > > i'll admit to rocking it in high-school, but it can't compete with land of > rape and honey and mind is a terrib;e thing to taste. > > remember seeing ministry at teh state fairgrounds in detroit. it was the > first concert that had there since buddy holly 40 year earlier. needless > to say- security wasn't on par with what you need for a ministry concert, > and it was pure bedlam. i just remember walking across the arena floor and > feeling broken glass crunch under my feet the whole way. > > > On Thu, 13 May 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > > From: FC2 Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Ministry has probably 2 really good singles per album...Psalm > > 69's first 8 > > >songs were all incredible. > > > > yeah psalm 69 is great all the way through, IMO. especially the > > preacher sample in the song Psalm 69 "and now, its time for us.... > > to give a little love back to god" right before the guitar riff > > drops in! anyway, that stuff is lightyears away from the synthpop > > type stuff they did early on. i have a couple 12"s that you can > > spot many of the typical drum machines and synths from early > > techno in use.... > > > > tom > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > andythepooh.com > > > > > > > > > > > ##################################################################################### > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This > email > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of > the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this > email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > ##################################################################################### > >
