hmm.. moving from northern/central new jersey to 
San Francisco hasn't changed my taste in music, 
really.  although i did discover that what i love is 
from detroit after i moved out here.  your theory on 
geography could explain a bit, though, why techno 
isn't so popular in SF (but why would it be popular 
in ibiza, then, which is not exacltly industrialized?  
because folks from industrialized countries party 
there?)  

i did have a hell of a lot of frustration going from 
banging brooklyn techno parties (sonic groove 
stuff) to "SF House" when i moved out here, 
though.  i worked w/ a women's collective that 
threw weeklies, and someone once wrote up a 
little thing about how we stayed away from 
"aggressive" music like techno. ugh.  (we did 
actually have techno at the parties, though.)  
actually, if i hear any more SF house  i think i'll 
puke.  

maybe you can just take the girl out of new jersey, 
but you can't take new jersey out of the girl.  

monikat

p.s. i've rocked rolando driving down route 101 up 
in the redwoods, and it was amazing.  but it's true - 
sometimes i do mellow out driving through the 
woods and mountains w/ some dark ambient.  

>On Tue, 25 May 2004, sasha wrote:
>
>> All this talk about where one is from has me 
thinking of something that
>> has been nipping at me since I made the trek 
from East to West about 5
>> or 6 years ago; how the landscape has such an 
important effect on the
>> impact of music.
>>
>> For those of you not familiar with the US, the 
Northeast, on the coast,
>> in cities like Boston and NY (and Detroit) is very 
industrialized. Here
>> on the West Coast, especially in the Bay Area 
(San Francisco - or should
>> I say Pacifica, cause technically, I'm 5 miles 
south of the city?), the
>> land is more open and people are generally 
more in touch with the
>> environment around them. Some places, like 
LA, don't have a city center
>> and seem like one endless suburb. So, the 
point is that the West Coast
>> does not generally feel like an East Coast city.
>>
>> Anyways, upon moving from Boston to SF, I 
noticed that all the music I
>> had previously been into, like UR, the more 
hard-hitting techno, etc,
>> did not feel or sound the same to me. The 
impact was no longer there.
>> Driving down the Pacific Coast Highway, and 
seeing the towering rocks
>> and blue ocean and blasting UR's X101 makes 
no sense to me any longer.
>> Hard to feel like a techno rebel with all this 
sunshine and blue skies
>> around. Although I still can get into the jazzier 
UR stuff, I avoid the
>> hard techno bin at the local shop now. House, 
funk, disco, environ, it
>> all sounds better out here somehow.
>>
>> Not to imply that techno, especially Detroit 
techno, does not have a
>> universal appeal on some level, but it's taken 
moving around to help me
>> understand that music's appeal lies more than 
in just the art. The
>> cultural milieu, and the environmental 
surroundings have an important
>> impact as well.
>>
>> Anyone else experience this?
>>
>> - Sasha
>>


Reply via email to