I've managed to convince myself that originals are usually better pressed (ignore trax records, they don't count in this thread) and usually have nicer artwork, sometimes have more mixes / other trax if it's a boot not a repressing....
-----Original Message----- From: Toby Frith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2004 14:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: RE: (313) Re: what's the most people are willing to pay for rekkids? There's an interesting dichotomy going on here. On the one hand we're living in an age where information (i.e computer generated files) is replicated a thousand times at the click of a button, yet we are still searching for authenticity, and prize it highly (ie originals rather than repressings) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2004 14:40 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: (313) Re: what's the most people are willing to pay for rekkids? >The last repress I bought was "Sweet Power Your Embrace" by James Mason (but >who's the singer?!?) originally on Chiaroscuro, 1977. Now that's worth >having original or repressed if you ask me. Ha ha ha! <cough cough> I only bought that as well!! I'm such a tit. Represses are still for women though, I'm just in touch with my feminine side, thats all. _________________________________________________________________ --------------------- End of message text -------------------- This e-mail is sent by the above named in their individual, non-business capacity and is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring
