i tried to have to put acid pimp's first record up, chesire #1, it took them 4 months for them tell me the record did not excist. well i have this "non-excistant" record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and galactic life force tracks i was looking for a few months ago were the same deal??
scotto plaztikjezuz.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 3:11 PM Subject: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks? > i submitted a couple reviews to discogs.com yesterday (they > finally got their sh*t together enough to send me my password > after having not been able to log in for a year because their lost > password thing didnt work). i got one back that was rejected on > the grounds of "self-hype"??!?!?! here was the review: > > "Divination" is UFO!'s second greatest moment (only to "Enemy > Infiltration". I played this tune for an experimental/breakcore > audience and even they could get into the absolutely nuts synths. > The squeals drive the dancefloor crazy! > > what are these guys smoking? where is the self hype here? (i even > use an alias on there that has nothing to do with my deejaying or > anything else. how can i hype myself if no one knows who i am?) > oddly enough, another one of my comments where i refer to a record > not leaving my box for 2 years is about to get passed, because > that apparently isnt self hype. i want to add more records reviews > because i love the site and theres plenty of tunes that deserve > comment that have none, but if theyre suddenly going to become > asinine, its not going to be worth it for me. > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > >
