Pardon me "Mr. taylor", but I dont see how somebody who spams the list
daily with one or two quick sentences of over-simplified arrogant
generalizations has the guts to call the discogs website "sh!t". Im
just one of the many free users and am not affiliated with the site by
any other means, but I still have to stand up for them if you feel it
necissary to besmirch their name.
Discogs has been very helpful to me in the past. I can only recollect
a fraction of the many times I have found discogs to be totally
helpful. Knowledge is power, and there is a lot you can learn if your
are willing to spend some time researching discogs. its also totally
free, you dont even have to be a member to search its information
libraries.
And is it so unthinkable and unforgivable that there would be spotty
information about Basic Channel? I consider myself a fairly well
informed member of the under ground community, and even i think all the
basic channel records look alike. Artists like von oswald arent about
advertising themselves nearly as much as you do for yourself.
On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 09:36 AM, Robert Taylor wrote:
Discogs is sh!t and there's loads of inaccuracies.
