Cor, just back from lunch. Cheers folks! :-)
>-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 3:43 PM >To: Cobert, Gwendal; 313 >Subject: RE: (313) Looking For New 'Detroit'-Style Techno > > >I was talking about the second one - I've just heard Akufen's >Fabric mix, which has Smoke On The Water on it and it sounds great >in the mix, but when I bought the album last year, I returned it >cos it was way too gimmicky as you said - these things need to be >spread out thin, it's only when you stick them together that they >are seen to be cheap novelties > >-----Original Message----- >From: Cobert, Gwendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 1:35 PM >To: 313 >Subject: RE: (313) Looking For New 'Detroit'-Style Techno > > >Hum... the first Senor Coconut was really good I thought, not >gimmicky at all (the second one was), it really showed how good >are Kraftwerk tunes, the way they remain excellent songs whatever >dress you put on them. Plus, Senor on stage was fabulous... The >Nouvelle Vague, on first listen, didn't strike me as really good, >though it is a funny idea and tracks will soon end up on Buddha >Bar / trendy lounge comps and the like... >Gwendal > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 4:34 PM >To: David Beattie; 313 >Subject: RE: (313) Looking For New 'Detroit'-Style Techno > > >Sounds like my reaction to Senor Coconut > >-----Original Message----- >From: David Beattie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 1:33 PM >To: 313 >Subject: RE: (313) Looking For New 'Detroit'-Style Techno > > > --- Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone heard that Nouvell Vague thing on Peacefrog? >> Genius or gimmick? > > >I have it - if you listen to one or two of the songs I >think its different, melodic and quite nicely done >however if you try and listen to the album as a whole >its all in the same vein and gets pretty repetitive >(all good just not at the same time is my view) > >Cheers >BT > > >################################################################### >################## >Note: > >Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not >necessarily represent >those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically >stated. This email >and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for >the use of the >individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have >received this email in >error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Thank You. >################################################################### >################## > > >################################################################### >################## >Note: > >Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not >necessarily represent >those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically >stated. This email >and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for >the use of the >individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have >received this email in >error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Thank You. >################################################################### >################## > > >
