http://www.fastcashpawn.com/ebay/pic7992a.jpg
ive got one of those. the crossfader doesnt work anymore,
contributing to my no longer using them when i deejay. im sure
this mixer isnt why i suck. it was really cheap too. ive had it
since 1998, its played many parties, raves, etc.
tom
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: jason kenjar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:57:37 -0500
>My mixer of choice for now is the pioneer 600. Im familiar with
it,
>I've got one, and I love it. Some of the features are handy as
heck,
>especially when you want to boost the over-all volume of a record
thats
>got a quiet cut, like old Kraftwerk records for example. I can
bump
>the bass on computer world! I would say the range of volume the
mixer
>allows to move around in is fairly large, and its for the better
unless
>you got some nitwit redlining everything.
>
>You mention quality is a big factor in your choosing mixers? Im
pretty
>big guy who more that occasionally strong-arms the levels and
whatnot,
>but its held up near perfectly after daily abuse for a year and a
half.
>One of the little auto quantize buttons isn't as sharp as it used
to
>be, thats it.
>
>I know some people say it doesn't have the warmth. I wont
disagree.
>I've heard warmer sounds, but like I was saying, I fluctuate
between a
>lot of different styles, so that range of volume the pioneer
produces
>is worth it.
>
>Plus, Pioneer has a reputation. While Im anxious to try new
mixers,
>Technic turntables and a Pioneer mixer is a tried and true
combination.
>At least you know you will get quality as opposed to blowing all
your
>cheese on the newest thing only to then find out it has some
awkward
>design flaw or something. I've seen that happen before, not
pretty. Why
>not stick with what has worked before is my opinion as of now.
>
> I realize this kind of thinking can be looked down upon in a
community
>where progress is imminent and people are always looking for the
next
>new thing. But I spin vinyl on Technics, and in my personal
vision,
>that combination stands alone. I guess the world of mixers is
give and
>take, but until I find a mixer that blows away the pioneer in the
>aspects I listed above, I'll stick with it.
>
>Sorry to get going on the 313, i'll get back to my one or two
line
>"this record rocks" reviews next time, but I hope you liked my
opinion.
>If anybody reading this in the Iowa City (midwest) area has a
favorite
>mixer, i'd like to be so bold as to ask if I may try it out. just
>holler!!
>
>-jason
>
>PS> The best thing you can do for a mixer is not buy crappy,
boring
>records and force the mixer to play them.
>
>now playing - dan Bell remix of john tejada's music for
doubles...talk
>about warm sound...this record rocks ;) laters
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 07:55 PM, Simon Hindle wrote:
>
>> I've heard plenty of reports questioning the durability of the
A&H
>> mixers (well, the 62 and the 464) - apparently the Pioneers are
the
>> most
>> indestructible, but don't have anything approximating the sound
>> quality.
>>
>> Perhaps the 92 has got these issues ironed out - it certainly
looks
>> more rugged, and finally combines features from all the
previous models
>> into one unit, as well as having 'DJ-style' fader knobs rather
than
>> 'engineer-style' fader knobs...
>>
>> If you can manage without linear faders, the Rane 2016 is super
hot.
>>
>> I do like vestax mixers as well (I REALLY like the PMC-250 with
those
>> dual EQ's), but don't know how they hold up in terms of
durability.
>> That
>> new PMC-CX looks pretty nifty; the master isolator function
seems
>> interesting, though I don't quite understand what it's all
about.
>>
>> Get an A&H 92 though. And let us all come over and have a play
on it
>> :)
>>
>>>>> Ronny Pries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15/10/2004 7:57:43 am >>>
>> xone 62 or 92.
>>
>> :)
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> hi mates!
>>>
>>> which DJ mixer would u recommend for a club? it should have 3-4
>>> inputs and most of all: great survival potential=)
>>>
>>>
>>> ../z99
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
________________________________________________________________
andythepooh.com
