it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know but since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting at one of Carl's former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his main inspiration, Carl said, simply, 'sex'. M
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" schreef: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44 > > > did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable > really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the > undying love for this track? > > Ronny and Sean I salute you! > For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever. > > The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses > much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real > instrument' version. > > Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it > live. > > Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track > that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean > you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it. > It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a > piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me > many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland > a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always > thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was > it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day). > (Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ > thing.) > > Turn down the moral watchdog! Big up the bickering! Bring back Alex!
